Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bolshiabarmalay t1_j6ypw3d wrote

Reply to comment by HeraldOfNyarlathotep in extremely long stick additional questions? by Unnombrepls

that's what I was picturing, I understood absolute zero to be where molecular movement stopped attaining supernatural rigidity. The last time I thought about it was highschool physics, so a very simple comprehension of the science as a whole. Interesting to think about tho, thanks for the reply.

1

HeraldOfNyarlathotep t1_j6yrvpz wrote

Happy to help friend. Agreed, I love these sorts of questions. They're like logic puzzles, but figuring out the answer usually involves learning something more broadly interesting than "ah, it's that particular sequence of steps to solve it".

XKCD's What If? Articles and books are fantastic for this, if you aren't already aware of them. There's about 160 of em on his site, currently.

4

Coomb t1_j783kny wrote

Even if it were true in general that at absolute zero there were no thermal motion of atoms, that wouldn't make things infinitely rigid.

When you push on something, your outer electrons are repelling the electrons of the other object (whether this repulsion happens because of the Pauli exclusion principle or electromagnetism or both is irrelevant for this reasoning).

Anything with mass, like an atom, doesn't move instantaneously when a force is applied. Instead, it accelerates. Therefore, it takes some finite amount of time to move the first layer of atoms back to their equilibrium position (i.e. how far away from your hand, or tool, or whatever, they would be if the two surfaces were just in contact). Similarly, it takes some finite amount of time to move the row of atoms, and the row after that, and the row after that. This is entirely independent of random thermal fluctuation of the atoms.

2