Kevin_Uxbridge t1_j9iuy46 wrote
Reply to comment by cookerg in What are more accepted hypotheses that similarly explain the aspects of hominid evolution that the "pseudoscientific" aquatic ape theory does? by KEVLAR60442
Probably lots of moving about the landscape. Land tenure is something we know precious little about for our ancestors but it's reasonable to assume that covering ground can be advantageous generally.
Also, the image of early hominids running pell-mell after game presupposes some things about the world they lived in. Running down prey would, for instance, likely catch the attention of the local predator guild, who might be just as likely to steal your now-weary prey and kill you too. On the face of it, human cursorial hunting sounds ludicrously dangerous in most circumstances. The endurance hunting guys have no real answer to this.
F0sh t1_j9jev6b wrote
> Also, the image of early hominids running pell-mell after game
Is not the image of endurance hunting. It's running at a steady, sustainable pace - a jog, really - that is not sustainable for the prey animal, which eventually cannot run more.
[deleted] t1_j9ji441 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9iz4vs wrote
[removed]
drolldignitary t1_j9ja6l0 wrote
Alpha male?
If you are lying in wait where you know an animal is being driven, why would you decide to chase it to exhaustion in a days-long relay race around its herd, when you could jump out and kill it? So instead of one person wasting days running after a deer, it's...a dozen people wasting days running after one deer?
A days long, pointless, relay race in a big circle around its herd??
And what, the herd does nothing but sit around, and the animal never gets back to them the whole time?
Alpha male???
[deleted] t1_j9izjx6 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments