Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

eIectioneering t1_j9kq2m0 wrote

Currently finishing my undergrad and headed into a gap year - I recently jokingly said that my absolute dream job is to be a scientist so passionate and prolific in my field (and communication) that I can become a ‘TV scientist’.

My main interests are biodiversity and wildlife ecology; how did you enter into the field of wide-scale scientific communication? Additionally, do you find that passion for wildlife and communication is almost ‘exploited’ in the industry? (Thinking interpretation jobs, I’ve loved every one I’ve had but to be offered minimum wage for jobs requiring a degree is really disheartening!)

1

nationalgeographic t1_j9lhg1g wrote

These are great Qs! And quite frankly, I am still in the doorway (really just a toe over the threshold maybe) of the entrance to wide-scale scientific communication. We'll see what happens. But I've basically been just putting myself out there as much as possible, and talking about the science that I'm passionate about in as many formats as possible (social media, speaking gigs, productions). Over time, people start to recognize that you're good at what you do (well, I try to be, anyway - at least I'm enthusiastic??), and they start knocking on your door more. I don't really know what other concrete advice to give except to not be afraid to cold-email people and put yourself out there as much as possible toward the goal that you have. The worst people can say is "no".

I do agree that we have a problem with scientists and science communicators being paid very poorly or not paid at all. We need to draw our boundaries. I try really hard not to accept any unpaid speaking gigs unless 1) I know the person, 2) the speaking gig will be serving underrepresented groups and/or for another good cause. I'll do those for free no problem. Hopefully we can move the needle by drawing these types of boundaries.

4