Submitted by Ethan-Wakefield t3_1198h4o in askscience
Holgrin t1_j9oiqp5 wrote
Reply to comment by jmwing in What does it mean for light to be an excitation in the electromagnetic field? by Ethan-Wakefield
>In this case, the electromagnetic field
I asked which one?
>Perturbations in that field,
How does this field differ from the fields surrounding charged particles such as electrons and protons? Is this the same field? Are electrons and protons then not also "perturbations?"
If this is an explanation from quantum field theory, how does this description of one single, continuous electromagnetic field differ from the luminiferous aether? And, again, how do we understand the fields surrounding stationary or moving charged particles?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments