Submitted by Ethan-Wakefield t3_1198h4o in askscience
Holgrin t1_j9pjilg wrote
Reply to comment by gsohyeah in What does it mean for light to be an excitation in the electromagnetic field? by Ethan-Wakefield
It is irresponsible how incorrect this explanation of physics is. Rotating a magnet does not simply create EM waves. The changing magnetic field from the rotating magnet is not the same oscillating magnetic field induced by a photon.
Photons are not simply ripples that propagate outwards from some disturbance of a field.
gsohyeah t1_j9spv1g wrote
Where did I say any of that?
[deleted] t1_j9t93nq wrote
[removed]
sticklebat t1_j9y8krp wrote
Rotating a magnetic does quite simply create EM waves, alongside other electromagnetic field changes. It just doesn’t only create EM waves. There is certainly nothing irresponsible or even really incorrect about their explanation. It’s a bit of a simplification, sure, but that’s appropriate in this context.
[deleted] t1_j9yc6e5 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments