Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JonseyCSGO t1_jbza4zy wrote

There's one big caveat to add on to this as well: a lot of current conjecture is that more stars are in multi-star systems than not. //Don't have a reputable source for this, am armchair at best with any of this.

I don't know how widely accepted it is that more stars are in binaries+ than not; regardless, in those systems you'd have a large variation in planetary creation and a non-trivial percentage mass in the partner star.

5

PlaidBastard t1_jbzeutw wrote

Oh, yeah, it's actually pretty widely agreed that most stars are in multiple systems, although I have no idea how many of those are on the scale of thousands or more AUs. Close-in binaries and trinaries churn everything up in such a way as to ensure planet formation doesn't really happen, according to lots of simulations and some pretty solid first principles physics justifying all of that.

4