Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

FlattopMaker t1_jdpj6bs wrote

Larger groups of people to create and cooperatively share or use the built environment, yes. This requires communication of a certain mutual sophistication. But it does not mean necessarily they were all living together, all the time. We have churches standing today that have taken hundreds of years to build from start to finish. This is even with dense populations, the technology, tools and know-how to construct it in a particular style. Many intervening events delayed the build.

What the changes were that led to larger cooperation, presumably over long spans of time across dozens of generations, are where historical record meets speculation. Some agroforestry researchers believe balanophagy (acorns as the main dietary source of calories and nutrients) declined as demand for trees for other uses became prevalent, which pushed the rise of the less-nutritive and more effortful agriculture. Numerous other options have been suggested. Perhaps structures were initially created from trees for thousands of years before megaliths became the norm.

2

FlattopMaker t1_jdpl1o2 wrote

Replying to my earlier post because the we-can't-see-the-decayed-structures-that-were-made-from-trees is speculation extrapolated from history. Greeks started out with temples made of trees. The vertical lines/grooves of the stylized marble columns we are left with were made to mimic tree trunks. The Egyptians started out with leather and chests for crypt or burial funerary goods made from real animal hides and real wood. As materials became more scarce, faux leather was used and wood grain-like grooves made from woven reeds for the chests that we're left with.

1