Submitted by Iron_Rod_Stewart t3_xy7u8l in askscience
RBUexiste-RBUya t1_irl21i2 wrote
Reply to comment by Kered13 in What counts as "observation" in quantumn theory? by Iron_Rod_Stewart
Different interpretations have put forward various answers, even some people say that "the observer" is a guy called Francesc Satorra :-D
I'm noob here. There's no facts that explain the observer effect, but I suspect that it's only an interaction.
What I can't understand is the 'spooky action' of the works that have recently won a Nobel prize. It's very difficult to me to understand why quantum mechanics is like 'to play dice' https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/popular-information/
astrange t1_irr0xth wrote
The “spooky action” (instantaneous collapse of the waveform) is part of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics, but isn’t proven to exist, as that’s just one interpretation.
There’s other interpretations that are still valid (many worlds, superdeterminism, pilot wave) and don’t include it, but of course many of those can’t be falsified.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments