Submitted by AlarmingAffect0 t3_yheipf in askscience
Ragidandy t1_iuej4j2 wrote
Reply to comment by Busterwasmycat in Is there such a thing as a gamma radiation mirror? by AlarmingAffect0
But aren't you making the same assumption that the OP citation proved wrong? All the same arguments were made for diffraction, and now we see diffraction is possible. That doesn't mean reflection is possible, but it does negate or weaken this argument that it's impossible. Actually, if diffraction is possible, then a specific sequence of diffractors should be able to reflect, right?
Sandor_at_the_Zoo t1_iug2l1d wrote
Looks like Lawrence Livermore was able to get a peak of ~50% reflectance at 384 keV for very small angles.
[deleted] t1_iuhdxez wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments