Submitted by ra3_14 t3_y5xlef in askscience
NakoL1 t1_ispa1hs wrote
Reply to comment by Xilon-Diguus in How does vaccinating trees work? by ra3_14
that article does say there's "acquired resistance" and "immune memory" in plants, though clearly with a completely mechanism compared to mammals. It's right there in the "Key Points" summary
newappeal t1_isspgr0 wrote
In addition to acting through a different mechanism, it also has a slightly different function from mammalian immune memory. Systemic Acquired Resistance is first and foremost a method of raising the immune response throughout the plant in response to a local infection. This is predicated on the fact that plants grow in a modular, only semi-deterministic manner with different organs living relatively independently of each other (at least compared to how most animals' bodies work) and the fact that they don't have a circulatory system that rapidly transports substances between organs.
Such a system wouldn't be useful in mammals, because a pathogen in the bloodstream is going to travel just as fast as any endogenous signal, and (since mammals are motile) an infection at one location in the body is unlikely to be followed by a subsequent infection at another location. In contrast, sessile organisms beset by e.g. a fungal pathogen can expect to be infected at multiple locations over a fairly short period of time.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments