Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

manugutito t1_itb8pzd wrote

The simple fact that dark matter seems to have coalesced in blobs means it must feel some interaction besides gravity, right? Otherwise it would not be able to 'cool down' and collect in a single place? Or could normal matter do a sort of 'sympathetic cooling' for dark matter?


Aseyhe t1_itb94zc wrote

Not necessarily. Dark matter cools in the early universe due to cosmic expansion (it's the same phenomenon as cosmological redshift, but it's even more efficient for nonrelativistic particles). The fact that dark matter clusters in galaxies does give us information about what dark matter could be, though! For example, it can't be primarily composed of ordinary neutrinos (which are technically dark matter), because they would be too hot to reproduce the observed clustering.


Nieshtze t1_itocg1w wrote

So dark matter halos in galaxies are formed as a result of cosmological expansion?


Aseyhe t1_itp1490 wrote

Assuming dark matter wasn't created cold enough to cluster on those scales, then yeah, that's a fair interpretation. However it should be noted that on galactic scales, the temperature of the dark matter was not the limiting influence on when structures began to form. That was set by the initial amplitude of variations in the density of the universe and the details of how they grew over time (which are determined by certain aspects of the history of the universe).

Since the dark matter temperature was not the limiting influence, we actually have no clear evidence what its temperature initially was. However, by probing dark matter halos at smaller and smaller scales, we might be able to determine it. The impact of temperature becomes more important at smaller scales.


Nieshtze t1_itrthi4 wrote

I see, that's very interesting! So the only 'dissipative' force on dark matter is the cosmological expansion, and the resulting clustering is determined by the density fluctuations of the early universe?