Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

rootofallworlds t1_j22bbjy wrote

The late fusion stages in a high mass star, say 25 solar masses, are brief indeed. The overall life of such a star is only about 3 million years, but in the dying stages:

Carbon burning - 600 years.

Neon burning - 1 year.

Oxygen burning - 6 months.

Silicon burning - 1 day (!).

And then the iron core collapses, in most cases triggering a supernova. (Some ranges of stellar mass and metallicity result in collapse to black hole without a supernova.)

http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast122/lectures/lec18.html

5

jfgallay OP t1_j22ta21 wrote

Thank you. OP here. That is a much more exponential time frame than I thought. Are transuranic elements the result of rebounding raves (I'm actually a musician) creating higher pressures? Or do they only exist in >25 stars?

1

ccdy t1_j235z5v wrote

There are two main astrophysical processes that produce heavy nuclides, the s-process and the r-process. Both involve neutron capture onto stable nuclides followed by beta decay, but they differ greatly in terms of timescale. The s-process (s for slow) occurs in environments where there is a low but stable neutron flux, such that nuclei have a good chance of decaying before they capture another neutron. The r-process (r for rapid), on the other hand, happens when the neutron flux is so high that beta decay is slow compared to neutron capture. Consequently, nuclei get stuffed with as many neutrons as they can physically hold, until they undergo beta decay and can accept more neutrons.

The s-process is limited to the heaviest stable element, lead, because further neutron captures eventually produce polonium, the most stable isotope of which has a half-life of just over 125 years. Nuclei typically go several thousand years between neutron captures, so the s-process runs into a wall at polonium. The r-process generally produces the heaviest elements including the transuranics, and also the most neutron-rich isotopes of lighter post-iron elements.

The s-process occurs mostly in dying stars, where nuclei can hang around for a relatively long time in the stellar envelope before being lost through stellar winds, or shed as planetary nebulae. The r-process was originally thought to occur in core-collapse supernovae (ccSNe) but modelling suggests that it is unlikely to account for more than a small fraction of the r-process nuclides we observe. Instead, binary neutron star mergers are now the leading candidate for hosting the r-process.

3

Taalnazi t1_j2dq8ws wrote

Can nothing be fused beyond iron, even if only temporarily stable? If so, would a quasi-star be able to put this off, due to its sheer mass? Or something else?

1

rootofallworlds t1_j2drq9r wrote

Iron can fuse but the fusion absorbs energy instead of releasing it. So it only accelerates the collapse of the core.

1

Taalnazi t1_j2duhrm wrote

Thanks. Hmm... and so far, no star has been discovered yet in their carbon-burning or more advanced-burning phase? Or do carbon stars fall under this?

There are supernovas we observe, sure, but do we know when we look at the very last stages before it? Can we detect the 600-or-less-years phases?

1