Drzhivago138 t1_j5v7fy6 wrote
Reply to comment by electric_ionland in Why do sample return missions such as OSIRIS-REx use their own reentry vehicles instead of just going to the space station for pickup and return with ISS equipment? by PromptCritical725
>They just slam into the atmosphere and let it do all the braking for free.
It helps that unmanned probes don't have to worry about pesky things like crew survivability during reentry.
crazunggoy47 t1_j5wu80j wrote
In a pinch, they can also lithobrake!
DoubleDot7 t1_j5wuusq wrote
Does that mean letting the ground do the breaking for free?
danielrheath t1_j5wxivw wrote
Yes, as in "Craft underwent rapid unplanned disassembly after an unintentional lithobraking maneuver"
Controlled01 t1_j5xofup wrote
Is that how they described that Martian lander that plowed into the dirt all those years ago
gandraw t1_j5xqxmn wrote
That's why it's important to remember the difference between aerobraking and areobraking when you tell the NASA engineers to build something.
Sergio_Morozov t1_j5y2d4y wrote
Did you mean aerobraking and aerobreaking? If so, are YOU a NASA enigeer perchance?
gandraw t1_j5y2mk6 wrote
Ares is the greek name of Mars, so "areobraking" is the equivalent of "geobraking" and technically means "braking using the Mars surface"
anomalous_cowherd t1_j60adde wrote
Nice, I'll use that when I want to outnerd somebody. (Said in an affectionate way, I like outnerding people!)
tdmonkeypoop t1_j63v923 wrote
Ok.. Socrates!! Dudes over here playing 4D chess like he's dust in the wind or something
[deleted] t1_j5y3t4n wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5ybawm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5ydolt wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5yg840 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5z5gho wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5yxt4j wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xtaz4 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j5xti3h wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5wycrb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5x0aht wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5x2ojq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xa80k wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xd9uz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xdm5a wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xfwvd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xr0am wrote
[deleted]
LionST1 t1_j5xbury wrote
Using elastic deformation of structural materials and the landing zone to rapidly dissipate kinetic energy, very clever.
Equoniz t1_j5xh962 wrote
I’m pretty sure lithobraking often entails deformation significantly past the elastic limits of the materials involved.
LetterBoxSnatch t1_j5z15vc wrote
I suppose it depends on just how elastic your definition of “elastic” is…the materials may still be capable of reattaining their prior size and shape, given enough energy and engineering dollars
[deleted] t1_j5y1v72 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5y512i wrote
[removed]
oz6702 t1_j5xl67o wrote
This is the kind of engineering we're trying to perfect over at /r/KerbalSpaceProgram
[deleted] t1_j5y6w7u wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5yugkp wrote
[removed]
Iz-kan-reddit t1_j5xlwoe wrote
> Does that mean letting the ground do the breaking for free?
I'd correct you with braking, but breaking is also correct in it's own way.
[deleted] t1_j5xs5i2 wrote
[removed]
crazunggoy47 t1_j5wv2lv wrote
Indeed!
[deleted] t1_j5xczvo wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xfeg2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xt2sa wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5yvhia wrote
[removed]
NetworkLlama t1_j5xeh9a wrote
That actually happened with the Genesis mission to collect samples from the solar wind. It hit the atmosphere at 11 km/s, but after slowing down, the parachutes never deployed. It impacted the ground at 86 m/s, contaminating most but not all of the collectors, and some of the science was salvaged.
overlydelicioustea t1_j5y8rvv wrote
mars sample return mission will not do this in a pinch, its the planned reentry mode to just have the container be sturdy enough and , well, just let it hit the deck.
[deleted] t1_j5y5sje wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j64bdkx wrote
[removed]
BaldBear_13 t1_j5ww4tg wrote
If Sci Fi movies taught me anything, it's that when a probe returns from uncharted reaches of deep space, lack of survivability is a plus, and is called sterilization.
dWintermut3 t1_j5xt71k wrote
NASA has a specialist for that actually, with the most badass job title in history of "planetary protection officer".
SirCB85 t1_j5xv9yr wrote
Wait, my understanding of their job description was that they actually responsible for making sure WE don't contaminate let's say Mars before we are really really really sure that us contaminating it doesn't destroy any indigenous life we might like to study before we annihilate it?
dWintermut3 t1_j5xw7in wrote
yes, that's a very important job of the PPO. but my understanding is as the staff's highest-ranked microbiologist control of potential alien lifeform risks to earth is also in their purview.
b33r_engineer t1_j5yifcj wrote
That’s what they want you to think, yes…
(It’s also true, but they do both)
BaldBear_13 t1_j5yi0tj wrote
are they issued a flamethrower? A cool suit? A memory wipe device?
Tritium3016 t1_j5zhk3z wrote
Do they get a green lantern or a lens?
[deleted] t1_j5wwhnh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xad3r wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5vyzsx wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments