duckbokai t1_je39i2a wrote
Whether or not the guy did it, there absolutely was not evidence to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury dropped the ball on that one.
Flavious27 t1_je3lf9h wrote
Which is also why the original prosecutor has been leaking information and fought against the conviction being overturned. He is trying to save face because he violated the law to get a conviction no matter the evidence or lack of evidence.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments