Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

pandacorn t1_iug2e7y wrote

Interstellar started great, but they seemed to want to play the most repetitive daft punk songs. It was a weird set list, they played "one more time" early and then you had to wait through a bunch of "filler" daft punk songs. I had seen them before at the old metro gallery, and this was much better. But I have also seen daft punk live a few times and I think it just works better with synths and djs, although i have much respect for the musicianship with the horns.

2

gamboot t1_iugud9v wrote

but it wasnt filler daft punk songs.... they were playing the discovery album in order. also following the movie insterstella 5555 which is where their name came from i am guessing? it prolly would have made more sense if the movie was also playing while they played.

They were good at what they do but i do agree booking a more high energy band might be more fun.

6

anatellon t1_iugf6t2 wrote

They played the entire Discovery album song by song in order, and each song in its entirety. Too true to the source imo. A lot of the songs are not conducive to the live show they did. Also the acoustics of the venue and the poor sound engineering didn’t do them any favors

4

CasinoAccountant t1_iuhikst wrote

> It was a weird set list

someone please get this in front of Daft Punk lmfao

2

christwin t1_iuhoylt wrote

Daft Punk would probably agree that a band performing their album in order at a party is a pretty weird set list.

5

anatellon t1_iuhqyiq wrote

The lack of enthusiasm in the crowd for many of the songs they played was proof enough that the set list was a miss.

4