Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

backfi t1_iu8bcr9 wrote

Actually disagree because highways that split communities like this and 83 have negative impacts on our city. This is jobs and justice, can’t think of anything more important.

10

jstreim t1_iu8n6qr wrote

The history of I-83 is an interesting one. While removing the elevated portion of the road from chase to Fayette street would spur development along Fallsway, construction of the JFX largely caused condemnation of industrial buildings and heavy polluters along the Jones falls viaduct. The I-170 segment in west Baltimore was way more egregious in its condemnation of homes and destruction of a residential neighborhood.

That being said, I think the highway to nowhere would be better suited as a high capacity transit corridor, and freeway removal money would be well spent tearing down the jfx from chase st to Fayette and capping the portion of the freeway near Penn Station. That would spur development of the penn-fallsway parking lot and help stitch together the station north and my Vernon neighborhoods.

11

DfcukinLite t1_iuazq4p wrote

Mount Vernon and station north are stitched together. 83 doesn’t impact those neighborhoods.

1

jstreim t1_iub1bqe wrote

Stitched together by what? A gulf of railroad tracks and an interstate? Just because you have a few streets that connect them doesn’t mean they aren’t separated. 83 definitely affects them, and connecting the two would make both neighborhoods more accessible to each other

2

DfcukinLite t1_iub1oxq wrote

83 is west of those neighborhoods. 83 before the highway was just a river. You need to look at a neighborhood map. Station North was the Charles North neighborhood. It’s north of midtown-Belvedere/mount Vernon.

2

todareistobmore t1_iu936u9 wrote

Disagree with what? Van Hollen's not arguing we should fix the 'to Nowhere' part.

3

backfi t1_iu960a7 wrote

I think someone deleted their comment

1

AutoModerator t1_iu84v3x wrote

Hello there!

Links from the domain present in your post are known to present a soft paywall to users. As a result, some users may have difficulty reading the linked content.

It may be helpful to provide a comment containing a synopsis or a snippet of the major points of the article in order to help those who may not be able to see it.

In accordance with the subreddit rules, please do not post the entirety of the article's contents as a comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

S-Kunst t1_iu89v1n wrote

Yes, it should be fixed, but there are many priorities which are in greater need and should not be put on the back burner for the idea that a magical park is most important right now.

−9

jstreim t1_iu8ojg9 wrote

While you’re right that this city has a lot of other major issues that need fixing, this proposal involves federal funds specifically for freeway removal as part of the infrastructure investment and jobs act. It’s a situation where the money is there or it isn’t. Capping the freeway to nowhere not only raises the land value of the property directly along Franklin and Mulberry, it provides additional development opportunities in addition to this “magical park.” The only drawback would be real estate speculators and outside investors pricing many of the residents out of the area. It would only work if there’s a healthy mix of market rate and affordable development along the corridor.

15