Submitted by sellwinerugs t3_ygm6v1 in baltimore
YoYoMoMa t1_iuadzwc wrote
Reply to comment by buttpincher in Patagonia Opens Largest Store in Fells Point by sellwinerugs
Source: a YouTube video
grand_larsonie t1_iub07gr wrote
todareistobmore t1_iub2a9v wrote
Context: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/22/politics/dark-money-donation-conservative-group-invs
talking about one without the other feels misleading, IMO.
todareistobmore t1_iuakera wrote
He's not wrong, but maybe a more balanced way to put it is that the Patagonia guy's doing the same thing RW billionaires do to... :gestures at everything:, and on basic level there's a real value difference there.
Every billionaire is a policy failure, but some billionaires are less bad than others.
buttpincher t1_iuausig wrote
The smug remark of “Source: A YouTube video” really pissed me off. As if you can’t find MIT lectures on YouTube or deep dives into many subject matters by experts
todareistobmore t1_iub1t9v wrote
Well, even though Adam Conover's generally good, the video's 20 minutes long! It would take significantly less time to find a decent link, send somebody that link, and have them read it.
Otherwise, while the glow up is bigly cringe, if you want to drag Pa Tagonia (...Pat Agonia?), I think Barre Seid (tbf I had to google this) really should be mentioned too. The difference between complicity and abuse matters even when it comes to billionaires.
buttpincher t1_iub2av8 wrote
I get what you're saying but he covers Patagonia right away in the video it's not like you'd have to scroll to find a mention.
todareistobmore t1_iubpwg8 wrote
But it would still involve clicking play on a video with a runtime of 20 minutes and ...hard pass, personally speaking.
buttpincher t1_iubv3lq wrote
Understandable attention spans are in seconds these days
todareistobmore t1_iubznve wrote
I have no idea what the point of that dig is, but be honest: does it work for you offline?
buttpincher t1_iuc13dy wrote
There is no dig...? Its true people's attention span is short no thanks to TikTok and the like. Im agreeing with you
BlarghMachine t1_iubykwi wrote
That’s literally what they do though. All charity is a tax write off. Amazon charities are also a joke, especially ones done through Amazon, as well as Bezos’ donations etc. But keep rounding up at rite aid so they can write it off their taxes and not have it manifest in any tangible way toward a charitable act proportionate to what they make on it. It’s about feeling better after all.
grand_larsonie t1_iub03ub wrote
Source, Bloomberg
[deleted] t1_iuafxqh wrote
[removed]
ocaesar t1_iubri0l wrote
/r/iamverysmart
buttpincher t1_iubstlh wrote
/r/cringetopiarm
Stop trying to suck billionaire dick
ocaesar t1_iubznxc wrote
Just say you don’t understand capital gains bro, she’s not gonna take you back
buttpincher t1_iuc0yyc wrote
Just say you don't understand shell companies and 501c4 charities bro, I pay capital gains tax. Spoken like a true tax dodging billionaire apologist. Keep eating that propaganda cock moron.
This dude's not gonna pay your rent or fondle your asshole so you can stop defending him
Edit:
Jesus Christ you're a stupid fuck 😂😂 You obviously didn't read the articles that I and a couple of other people posted. Reading is hard though I understand that's why I initially put up a video. You just know the buzz word "capital gains" so you throw it around thinking it makes you look like you know what you're talking about. Pathetic
> The Times reports that, in transferring that stock to the trust, the Chouinards are on the hook for $17.5 million in gift taxes. However, they're not going to pay any taxes on the value that stock has accrued since they first acquired it — what's called capital gains taxes. Bloomberg estimates that the capital gains tax on the donation could have come in at more than $700 million.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments