Submitted by AlwaysGrateful710 t3_ypo8l4 in baltimore
Valstwo t1_ivqj2nz wrote
Reply to comment by sllewgh in Fox attack on Baltimore? by AlwaysGrateful710
There are a couple issues with that. First of all, different people's opinions vary on who is considered a good politician. Secondly, the bill allows for 8 years in city council, an additional 8 years as city council president and an additional 8 years as mayor. A truly good politician can stay in office for 24 years! They can also run again for whatever office they had after sitting out for 8 years.
sllewgh t1_ivqk2r9 wrote
>There are a couple issues with that. First of all, different people's opinions vary on who is considered a good politician.
That's not really relevant. Whoever you think the good ones are, they're gone. Doesn't matter if we agree on who.
> Secondly, the bill allows for 8 years in city council, an additional 8 years as city council president and an additional 8 years as mayor. A truly good politician can stay in office for 24 years! They can also run again for whatever office they had after sitting out for 8 years.
Not a consolation prize. I'd reelect my councilperson indefinitely, but they wouldn't make a good mayor or president. Now that choice has been taken away.
Valstwo t1_ivqku6n wrote
If Baltimore were doing well as a city with politicians who were directly dealing with the issues at hand, I would agree with you. I understand your logic and I respect your position but I just don't agree
sllewgh t1_ivqlqci wrote
This new policy will change nothing. If people weren't electing effective leaders before, there's no reason to expect they'll start now.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments