The fact that he thinks of "environment and infrastructure" as one thing is probably a good sign. A lot of spending in this country doesn't consider those linked so you get like... a state passing laws about emissions reductions at the same time as they spend billions on widening highways. The built environment is the environment in some sense.

Ha, I think it might be slightly bad writing with not enough commas used, lol. I actually took it as three things---infrastructure and quality of life grouped together, in the sense of infrastructure condition being a quality of life indicator. So maybe it should read: Scott said his top three priorities are public safety, the environment, and infrastructure & quality of life...?

LOL you're both crazy, and it's four things. I mean environment and infrastructure is a combo category it seems, but that's funny.