Submitted by _green_cloak_ t3_115wh0b in books
_green_cloak_ OP t1_j93tghv wrote
Reply to comment by reddit455 in Are Publishers as bad as Orwell's 'Ministry of truth'? by _green_cloak_
Fair enough, I guess that's why I was posting this as a question. I accept that a publisher changing some select words is not the same as a totalitarian regime, and so not what Orwell may have had in mind, but then that still leaves the question of the long-term implications of publishers changing things to suit the times. Can you think of a better literary analogy for Penguins 'reviews'?
boxer_dogs_dance t1_j93uzr7 wrote
See the articles linked and discussion on the thread here on r/books. The article in the Telegraph claimed they changed Matilda's favorite author. I think it is worth verifying. If they go too far it is bowdlerization. I'm generally opposed, especially if they don't disclose in the book that changes have been made and what they are.
_green_cloak_ OP t1_j943sqg wrote
Agreed. If they're up-front instead of vague about whether a particular edition has been changed, I wouldn't mind as much. That aside, the mere concept of bowdlerisation seems like a pertinent issue right now, similar to when the term was first coined.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments