Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Flimsy_Demand7237 t1_jdvtgoc wrote

Very odd that you've had to pay to loan books out from your library.

−1

kwalshyall t1_jdvvcw7 wrote

It's certainly cheaper than that bureaucratic crook, The Wallet Inspector, at least.

1

Denziloe t1_jdw4476 wrote

Not really. Many libraries work that way. And the ones that don't, you're paying for through taxes. The books are paid for.

1

Flimsy_Demand7237 t1_jdxituc wrote

And IA paid for these books as well. They usually have a 1 to 1 digital lending system but the court struck that down as well, so they can't digitally lend at all. Again it's sort of disturbing that you're advocating a library function the same as a bookstore. Libraries do not function this way. A non standard patron or patron of a niche library might pay for membership but as you say, most standard libraries are covered by taxes. They are a public good. I would not expect the homeless or poor to have to pay to loan a book -- libraries are one of the few places they can go and not be charged for use of service.

As I've said elsewhere, there will come a time when physical libraries become either outdated or irrelevant. Then we will only be able to lend ebooks, and if this 1 to 1 system is not in place, publishers will make sure libraries cease to exist through unaffordable fees and conditions. They are already holding libraries hostage to their ebook collections through extreme pricing we have to pay for access. Especially so at academic libraries where Elsiever and the rest have libraries over a barrel on pricing and access.

Publishers want us gone. It's that simple.

2