Lae_Zel t1_iuaguuc wrote
>The issue with Goodreads is that it makes reading an achievement.
Nobody forces you to use that feature.
Goodreads has wonderful recommandations and great book lists. The website is worth it just for that.
pablos_blueperiod t1_iuagzvn wrote
This is definitely what I use it for! Love the recommendations and the previews.
helvetiq t1_iuajaxz wrote
I find be the recommendations awful- it almost exclusively recommends me books by authors I've read one book by and given 2* to. Maybe it's just me.
Necessary_Disk t1_iubmfza wrote
Agreed. I looked at the recommendations for a while but then stopped because they were terrible. Always the same books and never anything I actually wanted to read. They also often didn't seem to have anything to do with what I read besides a very very general genre correlation.
witchinwinter t1_iuc247v wrote
Same, horrible recommendations but I still use it religiously, especially to keep track of what I am reading. I keep forgetting the books I read so this makes it easier for me keep track.
[deleted] OP t1_iuajumd wrote
[deleted]
Puzzleheaded-Loan-60 t1_iuakssx wrote
If it’s an addiction to you and makes you to read as a job and not for your entertainment - you made a good call to stop using it. However there are people like me who are motivated to read by it:) Goodreads helped me to return to reading books. I just don’t set my goals too high.
jefrye t1_iuasr9d wrote
OP, I think it might have been more helpful to frame your post less as "the problem with Goodreads is that it makes reading an achievement" and more as "tracking my reading turned it into a chore" (or however you want to qualify your experience).
Then people would be talking about their opinions on reading tracking, gamification, and motivation (which is what I think you were trying to discuss), instead of specifically why Goodreads is good or bad. Shame that's what people latched on to.
Vanessak69 t1_iualref wrote
I get it. I’ll get overly focused on my numbers or that I’m not reading as much as other people (“This year I read 201 books!” Wut?) I do still use it for various reasons even though there are better sites out there. If you still want to track what you’ve read, maybe you could look into one of those.
P.S. GR just implemented their redesign and it’s kind of shit so rejoice that you are missing that.
NubbyNob t1_iuaomc1 wrote
Yes, the redesign sucks. I wish you could choose which layout you wanted.
Potatoskins937492 t1_iubjbiw wrote
That shows a lot of introspection and strength to figure out that something has become a negative part of your life and that you needed to remove the source of the negativity. It can happen with all different things, even things some of us wouldn't even consider being toxic in some way. Our brains are all different and knowing when yours was creating an addictive attachment to something that was negative for you is pretty darn smart. I didn't give up traditional social media until it almost killed me. It's not the same as alcohol or gambling, but addictive behaviors can make us unhappy or unhealthy and stopping them shouldn't get anyone downvotes. So boo to those people. Good for you for knowing where a limitation stands for you in this particular instance. Maybe someone else will realize the same thing is happening to them and sharing your experience will help.
jefrye t1_iuarnzi wrote
Yep, I mainly use it for the reviewing aspect and also to plan my reading list.
I've posted before to share my tips and tricks for getting the most out of the site—there are a ton of extremely helpful but hidden features that a lot people don't realize exist.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments