Submitted by HeavyBlastoise t3_z5tute in books
So far i have read 2 such books, namely Ghostwalk by Rebecca Stott and Princess of Burundi by Kjell Eriksson. I mean, there is the kind of Bad that you can attribute to reader's preferences, and then there's the kind of Bad where you feel like it's a massive waste of time and the book felt like a giant prank by the author because the ending is so nonsensical. And you believe others should be spared such experience lest they begin to hate reading.
I got these 2 along with many other books in my inventory from another person, so i feel bad about throwing them away or donating them again. So.. what do you guys do with your share of bad books?
Do you lock it away inside the deepest recess of your bookshelf so no mortal eyes would gaze upon it ever after?
Do you donate it believing other persons could enjoy it more than you do, however bad the book is?
Do you rip the pages apart, start a fire with it and then piss on the smoldering ashes?
Well actually i also got a thick book of mystery stories from various authors, and on the contents list the person who owned it before me put ratings on the titles, like 3 stars with the comment 'so-so', 4 stars 'interesting' and so on, like some kind of physical Goodreads.
So, what's your thought? Do you have any such book? What do you do with it?
qnSpectrum t1_ixy05e8 wrote
Well, I have the "Dosakhnama" by Rabisankar Dal. I bought it as I was interested in the early days of the subcontinent. However it turned out to be something containing all the dark sides, lots of swearing, malpractice explained vividly and rather a disturbing book to read. The author has received much appreciation for his work and this book has received accolades. But this is just not for me. I keep it on my shelf and whenever someone asks about it, I say that this is the worst book I have ever read. I ask if he or she wants it as the book is popular. It is still sitting there but maybe someday someone interested will receive it from me.