Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

wrappedinplastic79 t1_ixazyik wrote

This is not childish behavior. Collectors are picky about what they are going to spend their money on and what editions the want to add to their collections. I personally prefer only original cover art and am not a fan of modernized or movie adaptation covers. I’m not forking over money for just anything and prefer a certain aesthetic.

7

Fire_storming OP t1_ixbrv0f wrote

Ok. After a day I see that I missed some information. They know what this book is about, there is a chance they already read it. They are just making Fuss about it cause it doesn't look like they wanted it to look. So bullying and throwing SHlT on publishing house is childish

1

wrappedinplastic79 t1_ixcpv5d wrote

Honestly you are the one who is sounding childish. I’m going to go out on a limb and guess you’re not a serious collector.

0

Fire_storming OP t1_ixcq6b6 wrote

I am reading books not collecting them. They are meant to be read not to look pretty on the shelf

2

wrappedinplastic79 t1_ixcqocq wrote

The fact that you keep using the phrase “look pretty” is letting me know you definitely don’t get it

1

Fire_storming OP t1_ixcqvo8 wrote

I'm just using the same word people are using while describing the original book cover

2

wrappedinplastic79 t1_ixcr779 wrote

Here are some other words: unique, interesting, artistic…I don’t care about this particular book, it’s not my thing personally, but some people are more attracted to actual independent art and less attracted to cookie cutter mass published corporate pressed versions of something.

1

wrappedinplastic79 t1_ixcqb9k wrote

I assure you my aesthetic is not “pretty”. You seem a little wet behind the ears get back to me when you enter adulthood

−1