Submitted by disruptivelychill t3_zvbebs in books

I used to read A TON of novels as a teenager and in my early 20s, mostly classic novels (Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, 19th century French literature, etc.) Now (34F) I can't bring myself reading fiction anymore, and I'm kinda sad about it. It's like I have limited time and when reading I want to engage with something straightforwardly informative. But I still enjoy memoirs and poetry. I still value fiction a lot on a theoretical level as a form of art enlighting the human condition but have lost interest in reading it. A part of me would like to re-engage with fiction but I don't know, it's hard to find that interest again. Thoughts?

292

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

largeuglyogre t1_j1o8swr wrote

I'm on the other end. I'm 40, and as I've gotten older I think I read more fiction. I think it mostly just has to do with me using it to relax instead of learn as much these days.

255

klopije t1_j1oh5kt wrote

Same, 41 now and I almost exclusively read fiction. Reading is an escape for me so I love fiction.

57

DjangoBaggins t1_j1op84c wrote

I always felt fiction has the opportunity to teach more within a single story than non-fiction.

30

ElricAvMelnibone t1_j1rsz3j wrote

>"And now, to escape my trap, I will ask you these riddles three" said the dark lord Sauron, "what is the suborbital configuration of Nitrogen in its ground state?"

10

jordan_chez t1_j1orrx8 wrote

Same here. I spent my late 20’s and early 30’s reading so much non-fiction trying to “improve” myself. Now I am reading 90% fiction and trying to chill out.

27

zipiddydooda t1_j1p6ngz wrote

Haha this is so relatable. Hope you have a relaxed 2023 doing shit you enjoy, my friend.

6

eatsleepchillrepeat t1_j1plaiw wrote

Haha I'm the same. Non fiction / self help doesn't make me want to read anymore. I don't mind non -fiction only if it's in the form of a story.

2

Beep315 t1_j1r7cyw wrote

I do want to chime in and say that there is a lot to learn from fiction. Lisa Genova is a former neurologist (I believe) whose protagonists have a neurological condition and you learn a lot about that character’s disease. I read a novel that was set in Burundi and I learned a bit about that country that I hadn’t known. Same goes for Miss Burma where I learned about Myanmar and their revolution. Even Fleischman is in Trouble—I learned a bit about the social strata in NYC. I could go on.

5

kratly t1_j1qekn4 wrote

Yep. I’m a 40 yo dude and while I do still read some non-fiction on occasion, I mostly read as an escape after work or just as fun entertainment on the weekends. So it’s mostly fun fictional novels.

2

Mslolsalot t1_j1qiw4j wrote

Yup. I read for escape. There is more fantasy historical fiction, and sci-fi in my collections than ever.

1

wripen t1_j1qrouj wrote

I’m 33 and feel exactly the same way. In fact, even in fiction, I’ve lately moved into more fantasy so I can be further away from reality.

1

HauntedReader t1_j1o8ym1 wrote

I'm the opposite. The older I get, the less I'm interested in reading non-fiction books. I read almost exclusively fiction.

92

CMulgrove t1_j1omgbu wrote

I spend my work days eyeball deep in logic and binary thinking. I probably love imaginative children's books about magic more now than when I was a child. It gives me something that's otherwise lacking in my life.

If straightforwardly informative is what you're craving, why fight it? My advice is read what you want to read and just enjoy the journey.

If you really want to get yourself back into fiction though, maybe try re-reading a fiction you really loved. See if it still has anything you enjoy/value. Assuming it does, take note of what and search for a book that has those elements. Take note of what you do/don't enjoy from that book, choose the next book based on that data, and just repeat until you find your groove or decide fiction is just no longer your thing.

48

disruptivelychill OP t1_j1oo723 wrote

Great question (and advice). So let me think. I guess I fight it because I don't want to become one of those people that everything has to be functional. Also, as you said I want to nurture my imaginative side. It's also about language. I don't want to unlearn more creative/imaginative forms of language. (In part, i try to do this by reading poetry.) After a while my way of writing becomes too dry if I don't read fiction I'm afraid. I'm an academic and I relate to what you said, don't want to get stuck in this hyperlogical code I already engage with in my work on a daily basis. But your strategy seems promising.

10

CMulgrove t1_j1p06ob wrote

Aah, that all makes sense. I wish you luck on your journey!

Have you ever read Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell? If not, I wonder if you might enjoy it. It's definitely imaginative and well written. It's set in a world where magicians are academics and the book is riddled with "historical" footnotes. One of those fiction books that's pretending to be non-fiction.

3

ides205 t1_j1ocdm7 wrote

Technically yes because 1-2 per year is more than 0 per year. 95% of the books I read are still fiction and I can't imagine that changing.

27

Jaysonmcleod t1_j1odpux wrote

I’ve never read much non fiction to begin with, but the older I get the more I dislike none fiction. There is some good works out there that I really liked such as the the anthropocene reviewed that I really enjoyed, but for the most part I’m searching to be whisked away to a whole new world

25

KiwiTheKitty t1_j1opqkl wrote

The anthropocene reviewed was so good! That was the only nonfiction book I read in 2022 haha

1

[deleted] t1_j1o8pj3 wrote

Just follow whatever you're interested in at a time, and you might yearn for fiction again after a while.

Constantly feeling FOMO sounds like a bad strategy. Doubt age has anything to do with that too. The authors you mention specifically, are known to bridge gaps between generations quite easily.

21

JSB19 t1_j1ozywb wrote

I’m 35 and I haven’t read a non-fiction book since the ones we had to in high school. I just have absolutely no interest in it.

12

cheap-thrills2022 t1_j1oirti wrote

That’s exactly what happened to me. I was exclusively fiction when I was younger, with maybe 1 or 2 non-fic sprinkled in. After college is when I started reading in earnest, and the first few years ratio was 80-20 in favour of fiction. It kept tilting throughout the years and now at age 31, it’s 50-50.

I still love my fiction but am not raring for it like I used to, I selectively pick something that catches my eye from the new ones, otherwise I keep exploring favourite genres and authors more (for example, throughout pandemic I dug deep into Elmore Leonard, Raymond Chandler, James Crumley, etc.).

Non-fiction has become very important to me. Reading about topics that interest me, politics, current affairs (global politics, geopolitics, tech), economic history, modern history (20th century onwards), movies & TV production/cultural impact, etc.

8

ashpens t1_j1op6bg wrote

I've always read fiction, mainly fantasy and sci-fi. The thought of reading nonfiction wigs me out. Reading is an escape from reality for me, I don't want to learn more about this living nightmare unless I absolutely need to.

8

Starstuffi t1_j1ofgim wrote

Yes. I think there's a few reasons why.

When I was younger, I found fiction instructive. I had lame to non-existent model/mentor/parental figures and sourced most of my values and food for thought from media, from stories. (I happened to find these things really important innately; my siblings, however, did not, lol.) Fiction fed my sense of what was important and also fed my sense of aspiration for what life could be like - what could I do? what mattered? who would I meet? I had very little interest in non-fiction. It was story that mattered to me.

When I got to high school and reality set in that options were limited, particularly if your idolized roles in life were from the fantasy genre, I stopped being able to read due to some emotional issues. They were windows into worlds I would never experience. Realistic fiction didn't interest me, and real people were getting more limiting and frustrating by the day.

I've gotten back into reading in the last few years, but it's been specifically non-fiction. Spiritual-religious texts of the particular background that interest me, crafts/skills, tiny side of history from eras I find interesting. I find it particularly hard to find fiction I care about (and that ranges beyond books for me, I'm afraid). It doesn't feel like it matters anymore, most of the time. My fiction was never about escapism; it felt directly applicable to my life. But life my life hasn't ended up needing most of the themes I learned. If anything, it's just made me hurt noticing where real life doesn't tend to have the depth, meaning, or care that exists in story.

But at least the skills or knowledge still feels like I might be able to do something with it, gain something by it, besides noticing absence.

​

Reading through other comments, it feels like a certain pattern holds: youth read for growth and older read for entertainment. It just depends on whether your growth is given via fiction (food for thought, creativity, etc) or non-fiction (skills and knowledge).

7

disruptivelychill OP t1_j1ogrgk wrote

Love your answer, thanks for elaborating. I think i relate to what you're saying. When I was younger I craved new experiences and fiction opened the world for me. I could live thousands lives, as my own had yet to get started if that makes sense. So it definitely served my growth that way. I wouldn't say that I read fiction for entertainment/escapism either. It was paradoxically very practical, exactly like in your case. Now I have seen and experienced my fair share of life and I no longer look for thar kind of experience that fiction provided. My priority now is to learn things that I haven't had the chance to learn earlier, to understand myself and the world around me better. Thanks for giving me the words to get some clarity over my own experience!

Btw, interesting what you say about the radical difference in depth of real life as opposed to story. To this, I don't relate. I think that also bleak and mundane things around us can be interesting/story-worthy, depends on your gaze, it's all in the eyes of the person that looks.

2

Starstuffi t1_j1oiaqy wrote

Yeah, I'll agree with you! I'm now more interested in trying to engage with things (by doing skills or learning about them) than I am in just opening up more doors of potential. We're in the do stuff stage of life now, where for good or for ill, the amount of options/potential for ways we could spend our time dwindle every day. (This isn't inherently bad; but to dedicate yourself to learning music, you might not have the time or money to invest in learning to riding a horse, etc.) I'm aware of more options now than I could capitalize on in 5 lifetimes, much less the rest of this 1!

There's also not... as much that's completely new? Like, I frequently see a movie or read a book or play a game and know 'wow, I would've been WILD about this 15 years ago, it's a much better version of Thing I Was Into Then but have now tired out as an interest for myself currently'. I notice this with motifs/aesthetics I really like, and also NOTABLY with things that have archetypes or themes I really enjoy but have already thought about a lot.

I used to find meaning almost exclusively in other people and relationships, but that isn't working out for the way my life is. I am getting better about finding depth in other things independently, but it's required a lot of reworking away from other current human beings (which is challenging as a very social person). It's complicated and more personal than I think /r/books needs as to why that's necessary for me LOL. But history, ecology, and religion/spirituality is helping me find that depth in new places. Again, all non-fiction type topics rather than stories about people doing things for one another and navigating challenges between themselves!

3

Merle8888 t1_j1ou9je wrote

Yep OP, my experience is quite similar. Read exclusively fiction as a kid, teen and through my early 20s. In my mid 20s I realized nonfiction could be just as compelling, and my nonfiction intake has increased steadily since and some years been the overwhelming majority of my reading. This year I think I was around 50/50.

But while that looks even, I do find that it’s much easier for me to find nonfiction I’ll appreciate. A good writer on a topic I’m interested in, and haven’t read about this particular aspect of before? Most likely I’ll find it worthwhile. There’s just a lot more that can go wrong with fiction—every book is a leap of faith. I like reading a balance but I would guess my average rating for fiction is appreciably lower at this point. Although some of this is probably still my being somewhat newer to nonfiction. The more you consume of something the pickier you tend to be, and I am seeing myself becoming more discerning with nonfiction and DNFing more often as time goes by.

7

lucyfurever t1_j1oydjy wrote

Probably my favorite genres are is history and historical fiction and biographies/memoirs. I need to know about things that really happened because it’s helping me understand me in my life and peoples experiences around me. Least favorite genre would be fantasy. No time for that lol.

7

ledledripstick t1_j1plok6 wrote

What I love about reading is that throughout your life you will go through phases where you devour genres or eschew others and then something will intrigue you from the eschewed genre and then you will start to devour that...There is so much written material out there! ENJOY!

4

Wadsworth_McStumpy t1_j1qc9i5 wrote

I just turned 59, and no, I don't. I still read much more fiction than non-fiction.

If you're having a hard time with getting back into fiction, I'd suggest historical fiction, set in a time that interests you. Otherwise, if you're happy with non-fiction, that's fine, too. Read whatever makes you happy.

4

hettienm t1_j1orlxu wrote

Totally opposite. The older I get and the hotter the world burns (figuratively and literally), the more I enjoy escaping into a novel.

3

Ok-Minimum-1297 t1_j1ovaqc wrote

More fiction. I already get enough of the real would doing adult things like a job and paying for mortgage I wanna sit down and get sucked into a more interesting setting then the one I live in.

3

HildaMarin t1_j1owgdl wrote

I do more nonfiction and history, yes.

3

Ineffable7980x t1_j1o93ej wrote

Everyone's journey is different. I'm in my 50s and I find I read almost exclusively fiction at this point. Aside from the occasional memoir, I read almost no nonfiction. 20 years ago I read over half nonfiction.

2

lolbojack t1_j1of1zb wrote

This is me exactly. I can usually slog through a relatively boring nonfiction book, but I can't even get started on fiction anymore. It's tough to even select something to read in the fiction category.

2

HamiltonBlack t1_j1ohojs wrote

At 51, All I read is non fiction, but I didn’t think that was everyone’s path. I just feel truth is stranger than fiction and enjoy the crazy life and times and formative years of famous writers, musicians, actors and politicians.

2

TalesOfFan t1_j1ozbv8 wrote

I've always been this way. I just find non-fiction more interesting. I like fiction too, but I find myself losing interest more easily. It leads to a lot of unfinished books.

I find it hard to escape to fantasy when the real world is so interesting.

2

UnknownPleasures3 t1_j1o9zv5 wrote

I am the opposite. Maybe you've just not found your genre yet? I am in a book club and sometimes when we read a book chosen by another member I feel really discouraged to read it because it's not something I enjoy in the same way.

1

hosenbundesliga t1_j1oacbc wrote

I must admit i do read a lot more non fiction but also do still read fiction - have you considered reading some favourites from when you were younger? I must admit fantasy type stuff I’m probably less interested in now I’m older

1

grodj t1_j1oax2i wrote

I have been reading more non fiction as i have gotten older, but I still try to switch it up every other book I read from non fiction to a lighter fiction themed book to kinda unwind my mind after a very dense read.

1

TypicalStuff121 t1_j1obcfa wrote

Yes! I’ve noticed that as I’m doing less learning with school, work etc I’ve sought out more non fiction.

1

PBYACE t1_j1obt8y wrote

Age 64. A lot more fiction.

1

fuestles t1_j1ocq9w wrote

i do read more nonfiction now, but mostly because i need to read those things for my job. as far as personal interest reading goes, still majority fiction.

1

Zikoris t1_j1odhoi wrote

I'm 36 and have been purposely reading more nonfiction for the last year because I want to learn more stuff, but my inclination is still to read mostly fiction. About 12% of my 2022 reads have been nonfiction, in a wide variety of topics.

My only change in natural reading habits has been gradually branching out to a lot of different genres. Historically the vast majority of my reading has been fantasy, but over the last couple of years I've been reading a lot of other stuff as well - sci-fi, mysteries, historical fiction, horror, and even some contemporary here and there.

1

catspantaloons t1_j1odkn1 wrote

Nope. I love sinking into a good story. I actually don’t feel balanced if I don’t have some book of fiction I’m reading.

1

timiddrake t1_j1odtbl wrote

In my 20s all I read was non-fiction. Now in my 40s I read mostly fiction.

1

Mister_Sosotris t1_j1oirm1 wrote

I’m 36. I love non-fiction audiobooks, but I still read primarily fiction when it’s a physical or ebook

1

SporadicCabbage t1_j1okg13 wrote

I'm 37 and for me it's more of the opposite.

1

Jenniferinfl t1_j1ol5d6 wrote

Other way around for me, lots of nonfiction as a teen and young adult, now 75% or so fiction.

1

GrudaAplam t1_j1olnbo wrote

No. I did for a while but now I've flicked back.

1

Judas_priest_is_life t1_j1om96w wrote

I'm the opposite. As I get older, I find I want to read about worse stuff to make me feel better about the shit show we've got going. 40k and Joe Abercrombie hit the mark pretty well.

1

antiphonic t1_j1onscq wrote

i listen to audiobooks constantly and those are usually fiction, but the last couple of years the only physical books ive bought have been non fiction that i want for reference.

1

KiwiTheKitty t1_j1opm5g wrote

It hasn't changed at all for me, I've been reading mostly fiction with like 1 nonfiction book a year for probably... 20 years? I'm 27.

1

pithyretort t1_j1ora3y wrote

Might be more of a stage in your life thing than general life stages thing because fiction makes up about 60% of what I read well into my 30s. I only read 3 books published before 1900 this year, though - maybe you would find contemporary fiction a better balance of straightforward, informative, and enlightening. Or not - if you aren't into fiction, you aren't into fiction. No need to force it, but also doesn't make sense to me to extrapolate your preferences onto all readers. Everyone's different.

1

brunettedude t1_j1os4ub wrote

Growing up, I absolutely adored fiction. I loved reading grim dark fantasy, like Joe Abercrombie. But now? I have a bookcase full of non-fiction. But I've discovered I have an obsession with learning things I wasn't taught in school. I primarily read about gay history and have a decent collection of literature because of it. It's funny- I've read about Oscar Wilde's life yet I've never read anything he's ever wrote. I find history so interesting..yet scary. Things like the Civil Rights movement weren't that long ago! I'm still amazed- 1969 through 1985 isn't a long time, yet there is SO much history to be learned during that time. If you know, you know.

1

Beearea t1_j1osqtk wrote

Yes, that same exact thing happened to me. I used to read almost all fiction and very little non-fiction. As the years went by I started to read all non-fiction. I just got more and more interested in learning about the world, and I felt impatient with fiction.

I'm just finally getting back into fiction after several years away from it, but I choose books super carefully. It has to be something with excellent writing, which grabs me and draws me in quickly. Otherwise, I just can't get into it any more. The good thing is that, because I'm so careful about choosing books, I pretty much only read amazing books now (both fiction and non-fiction).

1

OnyxRose31216 t1_j1ot9n9 wrote

I can't read fiction much because it becomes too all-consuming for me. I get too into it and don't want to do anything else with my time until I finish it. I obviously can't do that because I have a life and all of its responsibilities. Plus, there's so many fascinating topics I want to explore through reading and I have a serious secondhand book habit. So I limit fiction and usually only read it when I need a little fiction snack (as I like to call it) after too many nonfictions in a row and I lose steam. If you want to get back into it, just pick up an old favorite you haven't read in a while and give it a reread. But I think it's also okay to go through seasons and read what's calling you right now.

1

deevyde t1_j1otjey wrote

I feel like I’ve learned more of value from fiction than non-fiction. The older I get the more I lean into fiction and the more I feel I get out of it.

1

HoseNeighbor t1_j1otz4h wrote

It's the other way around for me actually, but I think I just go back and forth in extended streaks.

1

dawgfan19881 t1_j1oujof wrote

We are the same age and outside of a science book I have zero interest in non fiction.

1

stalker_asn007 t1_j1owx4h wrote

Kind of yes. We all know fiction is the entry level books that makes us fall in love with reading books. As we go on we come across books of other genres. Or may be it's because rn I am financially able to buy books on philosophy, history and geopolitics.(fiction are relatively cheaper)

1

DoopSlayer t1_j1owyjc wrote

the peak of my non-fiction read was in college, and now I read technical manuals (for work so I don't really keep this in the same space of my brain as "reading") and occasionally biographies but vastly more fiction

I'm way better at appreciating the art of fiction than non-fiction so it interests me more

1

AnokataX t1_j1oyoav wrote

I read more nonfiction as a teenager. Now, as an adult, I want to escape and live those fantasies I never can even more. Nonfiction, while still great, just doesn't grip me. I want to isolate myself from real life more, honestly.

1

madpiratebippy t1_j1oywua wrote

I go through waves and it’s all about the stage in my life.

For years I read a book a day and it would shift every couple years to what I wanted- science fiction, popcorn fiction, textbooks…

It’s normal.

1

gecampbell t1_j1p1lop wrote

I’m 62 and read almost NO nonfiction. Very little of that holds my interest these days. This year it’s been Donna Leon, Greg Bear, Alex Shvartsman, Ben Aaronovitch, Sally Rooney, Ursula Leguin, Becky Chambers. About the only nonfiction I’ve read this year is “A Woman of no importance.”

1

ramji2406 t1_j1p57vu wrote

my two cents :

I believe im currently in the opposite spectrum. 28M here I believed reading non-fictions is the purpose of reading book. But found that they are good for nothing. All the books are just hypothesis, most of them beat around the bush suffering from Hammer nail problem.

So switched to fictions reading / listening nearly 3 books a month.

Non-fictions might make us to believe we are learning something with facts. But Fictions change my heart they do something to my inner being.

Non-Fiction makes us more intelligent whereas I believe Fiction makes us more humane.

1

edubkendo t1_j1p7cwx wrote

Opposite for me. I’m in my 40’s and find myself largely uninterested in nonfiction.

1

peachgrill t1_j1p7w7l wrote

No. There is so much BS that life throws our way, reading is my form of escapism and I enjoy reading fiction. I don’t think that will ever change. Fiction also teaches me a lot about random things (at times), and gets me thinking.

I don’t enjoy classic works, non fiction or poetry in general. Some memoirs are alright but generally speaking, I love getting sucked into an interesting story.

1

SlowConflagration t1_j1p7x8m wrote

It all depends on what catches my interest at the moment. I’ve always been an avid reader, and while I enjoy both non-fiction and fiction, as movies become more predictable, slopped together, and rely on special effects and Hollywood names instead of character development and plot, I find myself reading more fiction as a form of entertainment, especially short stories.

1

Mr_Skull_Face t1_j1p9fxs wrote

For me it's the opposite. I've always been interested in reading fiction since I was a kid and I still prefer to read them today. I'm currently in my mid 20s and I still can't make myself enjoy non-fiction.

1

Bananaman9020 t1_j1p9ndx wrote

I tend to like to read non fiction more as I age.

1

spizzywinktom t1_j1pa163 wrote

No, but the fiction I choose needs to be less like it reality and completely unlike my own life experiences. Otherwise, it just reminds me of real life - if I want that, I'll read non-fiction or go outside.

1

SlouchyGuy t1_j1pa3nb wrote

I'm similar, although to a lesser degree, probably mostly because I'm more bored or annoyed by fiction - it either uses the tropes I already know, or is poorly written, so I see through what writer was trying to do but failed to.

Part of the problem is that better written books are often quite sad with downtrodden or tortured characters, and when I read, I want to escape from my automatic mode of thinking "what if something bad happens" which paints already difficult life in a darker light. I don't need to add to that.

So I read memoirs due to verisimilitude, or pop science/science books because there's lots of wonderment and new information there

1

Consistent-Ad-3869 t1_j1pag6n wrote

Yes i think u will be more realistic in your life by getting older.

1

ClientLegitimate4582 t1_j1pawoz wrote

I read almost exclusively fiction now, I did a ton of reading to learn in college. On occasion I'll get a non fiction book that catches my interest.

Such as the Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot. It's about a woman who had a form of cancer. These cells were and have been used for research purposes all over the world including studying other cancers, HIV and Tuberculosis.

This happened in 1951 before ethics were of much more importance and this story along with that of the Tuskegee experiment involving Syphilis. Highlight why ethics and informed consent are so important in modern Research. Fair warning it's not an easy read in terms of how she gets treated. Lacks died in 1951 her family knew nothing until almost 20 years after that.

Definitely worth a read if you want to learn some interesting science and understand ethics.

Now off my Tangent about that I read mainly fiction because it's an escape from work and honestly all the bad things I hear and read about in news daily.

I prefer my reading be enjoyable and pull me into a world different from our own.

My advice in terms of getting back into fantasy is to think of books you maybe used to read growing up, find stuff that's similar but different. I'd also look at shows or movies you've enjoyed for inspiration.

1

sushithighs t1_j1pd55d wrote

I do one fiction to one non-fiction.

1

simonannitsford t1_j1pga0r wrote

58 yo here, and I've always been a big reader, almost exclusively fiction, and nothing has changed.

1

Ve_Ri t1_j1pgry8 wrote

Same. For me it’s just a form of growing up. But I still looooove literature which is why I’m glad I’m part of a book club that has fiction option. Also being a teacher I get a dose of YA and other literature. But yeah, I’m all about the big, fat, fact books these days. Just more curious and want to be a better human.

1

AdInteresting5479 t1_j1ph3qx wrote

Sure thing. I think it’s my sense of “there is no time to lose” as I get older and understand the reality of this life.

Nonetheless, I find fiction good to distract the mind and get out of daily life.

1

FiliusofAkhilleus t1_j1piaze wrote

Yes. And also more poetry than prose fiction. I don't know why.

1

volpenvieh t1_j1pjouv wrote

No. I'm 30 and still read mostly fiction. Heck I still mostly read YA because I prefer a faster paced plot and somehow teens just feel more relatable (maybe because my love life is once again a mess and I'm still not comfortable at being an adult who has to job and be responsible and stuff). If I read non-fiction it's a very rare exception - something like Tom Felton's autobiography. I use reading as an escape from reality and audiobooks to make boring stuff like commutes and chores more enjoyable. Not to say that non fiction cannot be entertaining - it's just not my cup of tea.

1

wise_noobie t1_j1pkach wrote

Enjoy your tastes and who you are. Don't feel guilt or sorrow. Non fiction is awesome and some of the best prose. And if fiction is to make an awesome comeback to your brain, it will! I was on the same situation and what brought it back to me was the (non fiction) A River in Darkness

1

ZaphodG t1_j1plrnz wrote

I’m mid 60s. At this stage in my life, I read to be entertained. I read fiction exclusively.

Pre-internet, I read far more nonfiction. With the web, I use search engines to find online information rather than books.

1

xanas263 t1_j1pm7tr wrote

I read so many reports and both academic and none academic articles on a near daily basis that I can't bring myself to read non-fiction for pleasure.

If I'm reading for pleasure then it's pure fantasy/sci-fi escapism and nothing else.

1

Rinzen_C t1_j1pnenz wrote

When I wanted to restart with fiction, I picked up genres that I loved as a kid - I actually picked up books for middle schoolers since it gave me a sense of nostalgia and familiarity and that allowed me to return slowly to the types of books I used to enjoy. I also started with audiobooks so that I could sneak in listening time whenever I found a few minutes to be efficient. And then eventually back to paper books. Might help you too.

1

smurfette_9 t1_j1pnlb0 wrote

I’ve always loved fiction and make myself read at least one non-fiction book for every 10 fiction books I read. I now love non-fiction because i only read the really good ones, but I find that I read a lot more slowly. I’m well into my 40s with family, I find I like the easy fun reads more than I used to. I think fiction is like an escape from the craziness and stress of the everyday.

I now know why my parents only ever wanted to watch comedy and no heavy movies, I think it’s the same reason of just needing an escape.

1

Cute-Age-9393 t1_j1pohfi wrote

My mom is 49 and hates non fiction

1

Suspicious_Quiet8417 t1_j1pp5n4 wrote

After spending the last few years reading academic or technical books for my degree, I tried to get back into reading as a hobby. I must admit that picking up novels is harder for me than picking up non-fiction.

When I was younger, I read fiction novels to escape but I'm done escaping now. I've been thinking of living and looking at life head on. Maybe, it's mindset?

1

Belkar79 t1_j1pqday wrote

Nope. Aged 43 and I’ve binged mainly on Bosch and The Expanse this year. Reading is a great way to relax and it doesn’t have to be more then that.

1

HeySista t1_j1pqvrq wrote

No, I went the other way. Used to read the classics, now I read urban fantasy that’s available on Kindle Unlimited. 🤷🏻‍♀️

I’m 41 by the way.

1

WanderingMustache t1_j1prfux wrote

Only ever read fiction, and i don't see myself Reading something else, unless i have too. I read to dream and escape reality, so fiction all night long.

1

Level_Ad1939 t1_j1pskc7 wrote

I do. But keep in mind that non-fiction can come in so many varieties. I love travelogs, and they can pull you in just like a good piece of fiction.

1

Tattooprincesss t1_j1ptef0 wrote

I love fiction, fantasy and fairy tales! The non fiction books I like to read are usually about holistic lifestyles such as Ayurveda, reiki, and health and healing. I really really really dislike to read about history lol

1

Impressive_Mouse1265 t1_j1pvezr wrote

Noooo I hardly read non fiction…I read for fun…I probably should read more books to educate me more but I don’t bc I love reading as a hobby…I can’t go without reading a book every day

1

evenbettertomorrow t1_j1pvw00 wrote

I am also way more interested in non-fiction now (current affairs, politics, geopolitics). I find it hard to trust recommendations on modern fiction and I have been left disappointed more often than not. I stick to non-fiction and sometimes read historical fiction or other fiction just to give myself a rest from new info

1

greymaresinspace t1_j1pwlzy wrote

Yes! Absolutely. I find it harder to read fiction! I rarely do anymore

1

ephemeratea t1_j1py1lb wrote

Did you read my mind? Because you 100% just described my reading habits.

1

oopsy-daisy6837 t1_j1py2ik wrote

I study and teach fiction, so I kinda have to read it, but I'm not complaining about the fact that I recently started enjoying non-fiction a lot more also. I used to read it as a requirement, but for the first time this year I consented to reading non-fiction for fun, and I love it so much.

1

anch_7515-7485-7889 t1_j1py746 wrote

Same as you, especially since I graduated 5 years ago, I sometimes have the feeling that I will get dumber if I don't keep learning some new infomration and also that working has somehow restricted my word to the niche I work in.

But I'm making a conscious effort to go back to fiction, mostly reading books not in my native language and looking for novels with an interesting setting to start with.

1

entropynchaos t1_j1pz8dg wrote

My reading tastes have changed as I’ve matured, but not away from reading fiction for entertainment. I do read a lot of non-fiction, but in a research capacity (which I enjoy, but am not doing strictly for enjoyment, if you get my drift). I’ve never been much into non-fiction just for enjoyment’s sake, and I rarely read memoirs or poetry of anything along those lines. I would say less than 5% of my “fun” reading is non-fiction.

1

CycleResponsible7328 t1_j1q07q1 wrote

I’m in my 40s. I read more nonfiction than fiction. I read fiction almost exclusively until around 2012, including lots of classics and modern literary fiction.

I think written fiction today has limited ability to enlighten; it’s all target-written for one market or another (either a genre market or if litfic, for MFA students and professors) and is as fragmented and insular as the rest of our society. I already know the third world sucks and that there’s some way people can survive poverty and terrible ordeals without breaking and that people call it “the human spirit”.

When I want an entertaining novel I read something in a genre and don’t take it too seriously.

1

jdinatl t1_j1q3s5w wrote

Yes. I have thrown in more fiction intentionally recently. I feel more like I’ve wasted time if I didn’t enjoy a novel than I do with non-fiction I didn’t enjoy

1

Cottongrass t1_j1q42iv wrote

Opposite for me. I only read fiction in my spare time as I have to read a lot of scientific publications as part of my job.

1

terriaminute t1_j1q55ql wrote

I'm 65 and I suspect the ratio hasn't changed much; I read between 200-300 titled works a year, mostly novels. Non-fiction is about one science book a year, and one to three writing craft books.

1

tranquilseafinally t1_j1q673i wrote

Yes I followed the same pattern. I read a LOT of fiction from childhood to about 30. Then I started to read a lot of non fiction. I've just started reading fiction again.

1

CanYouPleaseChill t1_j1q6amb wrote

The natural world is full of magic which can be hard to see in day-to-day life as an adult. Reading non-fiction books about biology, psychology, neuroscience, and physics spurs feelings of awe and makes me appreciate life just that much more.

"There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle."

  • Albert Einstein
1

screammcqueen t1_j1q6hok wrote

I had to actively work to get back into fiction after college. Nonfiction is just so much more accessible if you’re not used to reading, imo.

1

Casteel1973 t1_j1q6udy wrote

I read primarily nonfiction as well.

1

roidesoeufs t1_j1q98x8 wrote

No. The opposite. I'm preferring human insight more and more.

1

stormbledd t1_j1qc706 wrote

I read only for entertainment so just read fiction to enjoy lives that I normally cannot in the real world. Just thinking about a world and imagining the various scenes is extremely stimulating for me.

Non fiction- really enjoy history again it's events and I love imagining such stuff. Biology just my fascination with the subject it's extremely fun even though I don't remember a lot of it later.

Have attempted many other non fiction books, I always lose interest in them because I either find the author a pompous ass. Or a lot of times feel like the idea that the author is trying to sell could have been easily told in way less words instead of the meandering approach most of them take.

1

Imperiestro_KaroloV t1_j1qe7i4 wrote

I think I’m in the inverse position. I’ve mostly been reading nonfiction since at least high school with the occasional SF, fantasy, historical, or techno thriller book thrown in there. Now that I’m out of uni I realize that I’m a bit out of my depth when it comes to conversations about fictional books and general lit. I plan on catching up next year starting with Dostoevsky or Alfred Doblin.

1

effinnxrighttt t1_j1qfkd2 wrote

Nope. Although, I don’t read classic novels ever either. I’ve always been a fiction reader and most of my non fiction reading has been specific to a topic I wanted to learn, not life stories and the like.

I actually find I prefer more fantastical fiction as I get older. These days it’s all about the science fiction, supernatural and fantasy novels.

1

ahkna t1_j1qfyco wrote

Yes, actually. But I did a Bachelors in History so I was burned out for years afterwards. I needed to completely disconnect non-fiction from schooling.

1

Alpha0rgaxm t1_j1qg0cl wrote

I’ve started reading more fiction as I have gotten older. I’m in my early 20s currently

1

swearsister t1_j1qgaxc wrote

I've found myself reading more non fiction and self help in the last few years. I still love fiction but I think I just approach the medium slightly differently now that I have less time to read than I did in my early 20s and worked at a bookstore. I also think working at a bookstore made me approach books more from the perspective of if I could sell it to someone, so it was hard for me to digest books that were very personal in that respect.

A book club or starting a review blog (even if it's just for you) might make reading fiction more compelling again for you. I found that reading books while thinking about how I would sell them made me more competitive about my read count and more tolerant of books that didnt resonate with me specifically. But if you're not feeling fiction then that's also fine lol

1

notexactscience t1_j1qitip wrote

Its been fiction with me since I remember like reading. Though I make sure to read one non fiction book, once a year. Usually an biography/autobiography.

1

baddspellar t1_j1qjzos wrote

When I was starting out in my career I read career oriented business, leadership; self help, and technical books at the expense of fiction and nonfiction for fun. I came to realize these books were all pretty much the same, and they didn't male my life better. Now I read more fictions than non fiction, and when I read non fiction I do so because it's interesting.

1

ghostlyhomie t1_j1qlg0r wrote

Nah I’m the opposite now. I’m getting an MBA and read a bunch self help and professional books, but they are very repetitive and just bland at the end of the day. Nowadays I want to escape into a fantasy, some I’m reading Silmarillion and beyond to just immerse myself in Tolkien’s world.

1

agentkatz t1_j1qme6w wrote

Not at all. I think that non-fiction accounts for maybe 5% of what I read. I love getting lost in a story.

1

jelly10001 t1_j1qmvv5 wrote

I'm the opposite. Got back into reading fiction during lockdown after a good 12 years of not reading it and now, aged 30 it makes up 95% of what I read. While I do still enjoy the odd biography/memoir, there is something to be said for reading a book and not having any idea where the story will go.

1

aspektx t1_j1qqo9y wrote

I did leave most fiction behind in my mid 20s. However in my earky 50s I'm beginning to come back around to it.

1

TellemTrav t1_j1qrpij wrote

Yeah I'm the exact opposite. I used to love reading non fiction when I was in school but now I read fiction if I'm doing it for pleasure.

1

polly8020 t1_j1qsgrk wrote

62 years old here. I tend to divide books into fiction, non-fiction and trash. I love trash but if I read it too much it becomes a pointless waste of time in my head. I’m convinced good fiction changes you and how you see the world in the same way non-fiction does. I think in my earlier years I read more trash and fiction and it took many years past graduate school before i could enjoy non fiction again. I read more nonfiction now than I used to but still less than I read fiction or trash.

1

Wheezy0891 t1_j1qw6tf wrote

When I was much younger (up to about 12 ish), I read fiction. But, fir the majority of my life, I've read non-fiction. I've always been super interested in history (mostly social history and medical history), nature, psychology and the human condition, so that's pretty much all I read about. Every now and then, I might read an Iain Banks, but that's it as far as fiction goes.

1

skullfullofbooks t1_j1qx05p wrote

You might enjoy literary fiction, which usually uses more real world scenarios to explore humanity. I read fiction more than non fiction, but I'll read whatever I'm drawn to really.

1

Larielia t1_j1qxbfw wrote

I still read a lot of both. My current interest is Star Wars novels though.

1

Grey1One t1_j1r0o5a wrote

I'm 30. Most of what I read is fiction. Fantasy and science fiction specifically.

1

chuckalicious3000 t1_j1r3ryc wrote

I'm 39 and I read non fiction way more (but im a historian) I do love fiction still but its more like I dont make to time for it as often.

1

ResettingNow t1_j1r60q3 wrote

Oh absolutely… one reason is what you said about limited reading time and wanting to use it on something that informs and educates. But the bigger reason for me is that I connect almost all stories (fiction) to my own life and everything, except maybe sci-fi and fantasy, makes me emotional and sad. Nonfiction, especially pop science, feels straightforward and safe.

1

WheresTheMoozadell t1_j1r6eut wrote

I still love fiction, but I can’t read fantasy like I use to. Entire world-building is just too much for my mind to grasp. Historical-fiction and dystopian are definitely my go-tos these days.

I do find myself picking up more non-fiction compared to when I was a kid though as well. Mostly stuff on climate change, nature, historical stuff & some political memoirs.

1

Ozma_Wonderland t1_j1r9umc wrote

Honestly, I pretty much only read fiction to my kids unless it's fanfiction. I usually listen to podcasts or something other fairly educational on audible as I multitask cleaning and doing several other tasks at home, otherwise it's harder to keep track of the plot/etc if I'm only half-listening to something.

1

cr0wj4ne t1_j1rcg2s wrote

Nope, I've read more and more fiction as I've gotten older and have become a lot less pretentious about what I read. I have enough going on in my life that I want reading to be fun and nice.

1

cthulu0 t1_j1repm3 wrote

Yes, you are my spirit animal.

I just find the actual world many times more interesting than actual fiction.

The last fiction book I read was the Three Body trilogy, which I enjoyed very much. Probably because it had a lot of scientific speculation and extrapolation.

1

numex_24 t1_j1rhak5 wrote

I almost only read non-fiction. The only exception are books that I consider historically important or relevant to literature (like for example, El Quijote or Leyendas (G.A. Bécquer)), and fantastic or science fiction books of universe's I consider interesting or I like a lot, like A song of Ice and Fire. So yes, this is totally my case.

1

arcoiris2 t1_j1rk5bb wrote

I've been reading a combination of fiction and nonfiction for the last 7 years and I'm nearly 60. My fiction is mostly classics. I don't see myself losing interest in fiction any time soon.

1

asanders9733 t1_j1rnujt wrote

Yes. Exactly. And much less often too. I try to read my old favorite authors and they don’t hold my attention anymore. I am reading political and education and funny history books instead. And newspapers. My sweet old neighbor used to read the newspaper cover to cover. I’m turning into her.

1

arbutus_gara t1_j1rqcxr wrote

33 - I exclusively read nonfiction in my 20’s, and really didn’t think I could bring myself to read fiction since it felt like too much effort to put into some characters I may not like. This year I accidentally fell back into reading fiction. Guess it comes in phases

1

DarthDregan t1_j1rta94 wrote

Not particularly. I always just go with whatever sounds interesting.

1

Interesting-Fox-2164 t1_j1rufhl wrote

I have found that as I've gotten older (I'm 50 now) I tend to read more of a balance between fiction and non-fiction. I think it really depends on the person and what they like to read, or what they need at the time. In college, because I majored in creative writing and English Lit, I burnt myself out on fiction. There was a five year period after that where I couldn't bear to read fiction. So I read exclusively NF. Some years I read more fiction, other years more non-fiction. I love biographies, true crime, and self-help, but I also love a good horror novel or a cozy mystery series. Sometimes even a romance or a solid fantasy or urban fantasy. I've even been known to pick up women's fiction and literary novels. Depends on my mood. If I need to escape, I read more fiction. If I'm feeling more curious and contemplative, non-fiction tends to be my choice.

1

_-Pranay-_ t1_j1ruu67 wrote

Yes.. it's unfortunate

1

fupalogist t1_j1ruzhp wrote

I've always read fiction, but as I've gotten older (Nearing 30) I've come to prefer alternative history fiction. So I can base the world on what I know but explore the ideas of "what if this was different". "Man in The High Castle" and "Philosopher's War/Flight" are some good ones that are based in real world past, but tweaks to reality.

1

craigalanche t1_j1ry1ua wrote

Nah it’s the opposite. I know too much about the world now and it’s mostly very depressing so I go for the escapism.

1

IAmThePonch t1_j1s19re wrote

Nah not really. I’m also reading much more in the way of comics/ manga than I ever have

1

otmike70 t1_j1s5bu9 wrote

Quality fiction contains more basic human truth than any non-fiction. I like both, but when it’s time to ponder what it means to be human, fiction is where I reside.

1

AmandaTurner2021 t1_j1s7y0q wrote

Eh, early 40s and I read a mix. I'm all for books like what brene brown writes, in order to gain insights. But I like fiction too. Oh and I like memoirs!

1

balthazar_blue t1_j1senbk wrote

I (45M) have been reading a bit more nonfiction than fiction for a several years now, usually topics I want to know more about and didn't take much time for in school, especially history and philosophy.

I like to mix in fiction to break things up, often even alternating between fiction and nonfiction.

But even though I like fiction for the escapism, there are times when the unpredictability, especially with realistic characters and high-stakes plots, causes enough anxiety that it's hard for me to keep reading, so I've been going for "lighter" fiction more and more.

1

South_Honey2705 t1_j1sycrl wrote

I'm 54 and my love affair with fiction is still going on

1

Deep-Big2798 t1_j1t0jlo wrote

This is exactly the case for my gf. I, on the other hand, have been binging YA fantasy lately. I never really got into fantasy as a teen, and it’s a glorious escape. I’m almost finished with my second fantasy series lmao. Meanwhile, my gf has finished John Green’s Anthropocene Reviewed and loved it.

1

seenevs t1_j1t5ye6 wrote

Not really. I am, however, way more picky about the fiction I read. I research quite a bit before I invest. At 40, time is my most valuable currency so I am hyper aware of how I choose to spend it. I still find fiction very valuable and entertaining.

1

snoopwire t1_j20qy2l wrote

I don't really read nonfiction anymore. I like the idea of learning from books, but every general nonfiction I have tried is 100 pages of good and then 250 pages of repetition. I'd rather just stick to long form articles and interviews to be honest. No desire to read a proper textbook.

1

pragmatic-reason t1_j1osovk wrote

Somewhere in high school I lost my spark for reading fiction. Not quite sure how or why, but I just lost the ability to “get lost in a good work of fiction.”

I’ve read many highly acclaimed fiction books over the past couple years to try to rekindle the love I had for fiction as a child, but I can’t help but feel unfulfilled at the end of reading.

Nowadays, I almost exclusively read non-fiction. I find I enjoy it more and get more out of it.

0

melatonia t1_j1pq13l wrote

This is kind of by design. There is more fiction than non-fiction written for children.

0

FamousOrphan t1_j1qyvub wrote

I go through phases. You might find yourself drifting back into enjoying fiction in a decade, who knows!

0

Organic_Rock_6974 t1_j1rarx1 wrote

Yes! I used to read a lot of fantasy and fiction, but I started to get bored quickly, i also found that i could find those things that i used to love as a teenager in other type of literature that is mostly better written and more complex, there are some amazing fiction books for sure but is not my type of book anymore, reality is so weird sometimes that you can find some amazing stories that still transport you to different places and realities

0

xl_RENEG4DE_lx t1_j1otzph wrote

My acquaintance would like to know if porn is fiction or non-fiction?

−1

newpinkbunnyslippers t1_j1ovjiy wrote

Yes. And I find that I look down on people who read fairytales for their own amusement too.

−2