Submitted by angelojann t3_10nigaq in books
Yrcrazypa t1_j6bh70f wrote
Reply to comment by Fox-and-Sons in Dickens' David Copperfield: Were men more affectionate with each other in the 18th century? by angelojann
>Fear of being perceived as gay only became an issue with the increasing visibility of homosexuality & its gradual social acceptance. Normal affection between boys was sexualized. The visibility of homosexuality had a direct negative effect on the expression of intimacy & affection between heterosexual men, just as it also put a damper on things like girlfriends holding hands while they walk (something I remember being normal & common when I was a kid but which gradually ceased when girls started getting called lesbians for doing so).
>The sexualization of same-sex affection is what killed it.
This is literally a value judgement and saying that it's gay people's fault. That's homophobic, and if you look at their post history you'll see tons of bullshit "heteronormativity" being supported.
HettiePie t1_j6czacu wrote
No. They're blaming the "sexualization". That is an action by the person doing the sexualizing.
Read: If you sexualize teen girls for dressing in a certain way, we should not blame the girl; however, we should blame the person who sexualizes the child.
Also, this person is stating facts. History is what it is. The person stating the facts is not a homophobe for speaking the truth.
Seriously, people? Taking an excellent topic to spur intelligent intellectual conversation and using it as a chance to go all "social justice warrior"? What a drag.
ahkna t1_j6g90b0 wrote
This is r/books, so I'm begging you to READ A BOOK.
Just because you're comfortable being homophobic doesn't make it correct.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments