Submitted by switchonthesky t3_10q69il in books
I just finished Legends and Lattes, which is described as "A Novel of High Fantasy and Low Stakes," and, while I enjoyed the book, I felt like the author confused "low stakes" with "small stakes." It actually had a lot more stakes than I was expecting, with the (spoilers) >!guy harassing the assistant, the mafia protection racket, and the attempted theft/burning down of the coffee shop. !<The stakes actually felt more real than "the world is ending" type fantasy, probably because of their small and personal scope (a business owner trying to gain a foothold, etc).
It got me curious, are there other books you've read that you feel had "false advertising," either in their marketing, the way their fans portray the book, or just your own preconceived notions? That doesn't mean the book was bad, just different than you expected.
The other example I'd give is Gideon the Ninth; "lesbian necromancers in space" is, imo, a really inaccurate tagline for this book - it's much more of a psychological horror locked room mystery than I think that tagline makes it seem.
elizabeth-cooper t1_j6oscd2 wrote
I'm almost finished with Legends and Lattes and most of the book is low-stakes. Plus, the serious parts aren't presented in a heavy way. For example, >!Viv is depressed about the fire for two days and then conveniently everyone pulls together to rebuild despite the fact that there's no money for it.!<
I find false advertisement more common in literary fiction, where the person who wrote the summary tries to invent a plot or raise stakes that're not actually there. For example, I just read We Measure the Earth with Our Bodies by Tsering Yangzom Lama. Part of the description is:
>When Dolma comes across the Nameless Saint in a collector's vault, she must decide what she is willing to do for her community, even if it means risking her dreams.
This is really not what happens at all.