Submitted by gooserider t3_11dn08w in boston
reaper527 t1_ja9ncaw wrote
sounds like an invitation to get sued trying to pick a fight with lawyers.
like, even if careers aren't protected class, they'll find something else to nitpick on as a basis to go after the lister.
at the end of the day, i don't get why the owner would even care who's renting as long as they're
- paying their rent on time
- not damaging the property
- not doing anything illegal that's going to cause problems for the landlord
blabla1897 t1_ja9wgx1 wrote
I think the idea is if they are a lawyer and they don't adhere to rules #1-3 then the ensuing litigation or whatever is going to be much more of a pain
reaper527 t1_ja9xgys wrote
> I think the idea is if they are a lawyer and they don’t adhere to rules #1-3 then the ensuing litigation or whatever is going to be much more of a pain
I guess that makes sense, but what are the odds of a lawyer not following poi ts 1-3? Seems like something that would hurt their own professional reputation and career.
wishforagreatmistake t1_jaabr5a wrote
In theory, but in practice, the bar association PROBABLY isn't going to discipline them for being a deadbeat or a tenant from hell unless they either do something that makes the news or piss someone important off. The light most favorable to the landlord here is that they previously had a lawyer tenant who was an absolute nightmare and then did everything in their power to drag out the eviction process and fight a war of attrition.
nateisic t1_jaawzi3 wrote
Bingo
flyingmountain t1_jacrltp wrote
The landlord cares if their tenants are lawyers because they're doing illegal shit and don't want anyone to call them on it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments