senatorium t1_j8o30dk wrote
CA implemented "builders remedy" in cases like this (and NY is proposing it). Essentially, if a town doesn't submit a compliant housing plan, their zoning gets suspended and developers are allowed to bypass the zoning code with certain types of buildings (like buildings with a certain amount of affordable units). I'd like to see MA move that way. We have a housing crisis - emphasis on crisis. People are leaving our state and there's a real possibility that MA will be losing a House seat in the next census. People are being pushed into poverty and into homelessness. I have zero sympathy with these towns talking about "neighborhood character" next to concerns like this.
raabbasi t1_j8oh53v wrote
The solution to homelessness is giving developers subsidies is what you're saying.
Archivist1380 t1_j8os1nm wrote
I mean, if you want the homeless to build their own homes you can look to India and see how that’s panned out. Massive, poorly built and unregulated shanty towns aren’t exactly the answer most people want to the question of “how do we solve homelessness”
Mt8045 t1_j8pdgib wrote
That’s not even what they said. Do you know what a subsidy is? A change in zoning restrictions is not a subsidy.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments