Comments
smokesmokesmokes t1_jdq91rx wrote
And it's made of cardboard.
DarkMetroid567 t1_jdqi7yt wrote
Most of the buses look pretty clean though. You can just tell the colors on this one don’t pop like a real bus.
Non-jabroni_redditor t1_jdqiege wrote
so they went the accurate recreation route, eh?
Mumbles76 t1_jdqj4vo wrote
They should have left this at Mass and Cass for a week, that would have weathered it nicely.
GM_Pax t1_jdqrilr wrote
Unless they plan to wreck it .... why not just rent one from the MBTA ...?
Lemonio t1_jdqrwcj wrote
If they need it for many days this is probably cheaper
Internal_Map7615 t1_jdqsbin wrote
Imagine if the MBTA had 20317 buses available for use.
b0ngsm0ke t1_jdqtrve wrote
It needs to show up on schedule.
big_brotherx101 OP t1_jdqypvl wrote
I suppose I meant to say they didn't have any wear and tear, like scratched and scuffed windows, discoloration, salt aging.
DarkMetroid567 t1_jdr42au wrote
True true. Tbh I find a lot of that hard to notice from the outside, but pretty obvious on the inside.
When I walked by this yesterday I also realized the lack of bike rack is a dead giveaway.
Yonand331 t1_jdr56qi wrote
When does the movie take place, looks like an older 80s/90s bus
rj31789 t1_jdr5jar wrote
I love the number on the bus. Nice touch for a city like this. 🍀
ch1ck3npotpi3 t1_jdr9yef wrote
Some transit agencies use a 5 digit numbering scheme despite not having over 10000 buses. Under the most common 5 digit scheme, the first two digits represent the year the bus was purchased, the third digit represents the size of the bus (3 for 30-35ft, 4 for 40-45ft, 6 for 60ft), and the last two digits represent the fleet number within that series. For example, 20317 would correspond to the seventeeth 35ft bus purchased in 2020. In this picture, the bus is a 35 foot Gillig Low Floor bus. The numbering makes sense, but the MBTA has never owned a Gillig bus (their primary vendor is New Flyer) and has not had 35 foot buses since 2007. The MBTA also uses a 4 digit numbering scheme that does not incorporate purchase date or bus size.
jujubee516 t1_jdraqix wrote
Wow! Didn't know this
ilickthings t1_jdrdrah wrote
Was that filming downtown last night, and why the roads were closed heading towards government center?
big_brotherx101 OP t1_jdrexei wrote
Yep, the redline shuttle bus was moved cuz they were filing between the government building and fanueil hall around 11
Borner791 t1_jdrjxb8 wrote
st patrick's day, ha!
UltravioletClearance t1_jdrmj61 wrote
It looks like a low poly LOD texture in a video game.
bobannnderson t1_jdrs20x wrote
lmao a Gillig MBTA bus. never thought i’d see that day 😂
ZizZizZiz t1_jdrwoy4 wrote
It's definitely just there to get blown up.
Steltek t1_jds03kj wrote
Not even close? 80/90's buses were the RTS' that were like 20ft tall and had body panels hanging on by half a thread and one courageous ziptie.
JumboChimp t1_jdsjz2v wrote
It looks like a low-polygon model of a bus from a Grand Theft Auto game set in a fictionalized version of Boston.
I bet that would be a fun game.
Yonand331 t1_jdszczl wrote
It's definitely not a newer style body bus, the roof doesn't have the contour
TDKevin t1_jdtfa1d wrote
Were they filming on A street the other day? On my way to work they had all the parking blocked off and on my way home a bunch of crew and two vans that said something like movie or entertainment catering.
-Dixieflatline t1_jdv23e3 wrote
Something is off. Those headlights look like the stickers used in NASCAR. Is this a real bus or just a movie prop mock up?
pkcommando t1_jdv2ilj wrote
Okay, no bike rack, that's what was bothering me the most about it. I couldn't quite place it.
Trimere t1_jdpy7gx wrote
It’s too square.