ChateauDeDangle t1_iuij3kg wrote
Reply to comment by Effective_Golf_3311 in They caught the Brighton Peeping Tom by capnlumps
Why are you against bail?
Effective_Golf_3311 t1_iuimyye wrote
There are crimes where bail (should just be RoR if bail applies unless the person has the means aka lots of money to flee prosecution) is applicable, and crimes (like this one) where it is not.
We have a saying for the bail commissioners: “Make it $40 since it might as well be a million.” Bail is backwards.
In this case? He should just be held.
ChateauDeDangle t1_iuinish wrote
What’s your basis for believing bail should be denied for this person’s crimes? Just looking for some clarification
Effective_Golf_3311 t1_iuipa5r wrote
The fact that they’ve already placed multiple people in fear and have likely traumatized many of them. He’s victimizing people, not property, and appears to be escalating.
He can be held as he is clearly a danger to the public if he is allowed to be free and the state can’t guarantee the safety of the public from this monster whiles he’s out on bail.
But who am I kidding, we’ve got people on ELMO for shooting people still shooting people and nobody is interested in holding them so this guy will be out by the close of court today. Hopefully that makes you feel better about the states current bail situation.
[deleted] t1_iuiqqs5 wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments