Submitted by _Hack_The_Planet_ t3_10p6m8o in boston
hx87 t1_j6k9q06 wrote
Reply to comment by wsdog in Maura Healey wants to solve the state’s housing crisis. Here’s step one. by _Hack_The_Planet_
If a SFH is surrounded by 10 story apartment buildings that aren't vacant, you can be pretty damn sure that there is plenty of demand for 10 story apartment buildings.
> With apartment buildings built near every commuter rail station till the cape this will go away.
I don't see what the problem with this is. Why is demand for small towns full of SFHs a good thing? If Boston were built to the density of NYC, we'd be cheaper than NYC, and making close to NYC money too.
wsdog t1_j6kagcz wrote
It's like saying why someone needs Legal Seafoods if there are 10 McDonald's nearby. 10x cheaper!
hx87 t1_j6kc9k8 wrote
"Sorry, you can't build a McDonald's here (even though there's plenty of demand to justify it). Legal Seafoods only (even though current owners paid McDonald's prices 50 years ago, and displaced No. 9 Park in the process)!"
wsdog t1_j6kd2co wrote
Nobody will patronize Legal Seafoods if it's next door to MD's. Makes sense.
If you follow your argument all homeowners must be pro-construction because they would want to flip their land for profit. The problem is that they have to live somewhere, and they don't want to live in apartments because if they would, they would buy in Seaport.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments