Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

n1keym1key t1_islgxay wrote

  1. Not again, the original source on this is known for bullshit.
  2. Why would they do this when they can't even make enough stock of the current versions?
3

spoonard OP t1_islkfo4 wrote

  1. Who is the 'original source' The article doesn't mention who it is.

  2. They do it because last gen they proved people will buy them. What other reason do they need?

1

n1keym1key t1_islnay2 wrote

Check one of the MANY other times this was posted on here and debunked. All deets are there for you to read :)

1

kylemf88 t1_isp18kh wrote

He’s called tez2 or something. A rockstar games “leaker”, but I’m pretty sure he gets most of his info from data mining or reposting other leakers, so this might be a attention grab.

1

blazinlow86 t1_ispkfuq wrote

Ps5 could use a upgraded to be more competitive with the series X and to shrink it down into better dimensions, but I don't see them needing to change anything with the Series x this generation 👍

1

Ordinary_Law_8599 t1_isseb02 wrote

It would make perfect since for them to release a pro model capable of 60 fps at 4k with Raytracing or 120 fps with 4k or a 120 rtx mode. I mean its possible because the new consoles can't hit 60 with ray tracing very well. But it begs the question if in a year they release these consoles capable of what they should of been capable of to begin with. With the production issues and the fact that there's about 5 or 6 actual games only for these consoles. Then I feel slighted by both companies and what was the point of shelling out 1000 bucks to get these systems when they could of waited and focused on actually delivering the next gen instead of half assing things. This is not like a cellphone. If they were capable of delivering 60fps with ray tracing and 120 at 4k, they should of delivered it on launch day. Not lock these features behind a paywall and release them in 2023 or 2024 when covid basically made 2020 and 2021 hell on consumers and developers. I just feel like what's the point? If you could of done better you should of waited, it was very clear software was not going to be able to utilize these consoles for 3 years into release. Was it really an effect of the shortages and the pandemic? Or was this smart marketing and greed and this was the plan the whole time to milk everything they could out of the consumer?

1

of_patrol_bot t1_isseblt wrote

Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.

It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.

Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.

Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.

2

spicytoast589 t1_isztjkq wrote

Seeing how they are still making games to support ps4 sighs they really should move to more of an upgrade system. A new model should come out 2-3 years. It's not like they would drop support for any games for quite a while. Console hardware is not as unique as it used to be.. I assume they don't do this because the longer they sell an old product the larger their margins are

1