Submitted by Big-Golf4266 t3_yxeq36 in consoles
barbanonfacitvirum t1_iwqbvi4 wrote
Reply to comment by n1keym1key in Older Gen consoles need to lose support for gaming to move forward meaningfully. by Big-Golf4266
My point was more that they're releasing consoles too frequently now.
n1keym1key t1_iwqn8er wrote
No, tech moves faster now than it did in the old days, that's the reason for shorter lifespans, that and the fact that nowadays everyone wants the next big thing as soon as they have got their hands on the current big thing.
barbanonfacitvirum t1_iwqnx43 wrote
You're kind of making my point for me. It isn't that I don't understand what is happening, it's that I think it is a bad thing. Shorter lifespans for equipment that costs roughly the same (with inflation taken into account) means that if something lasts half as long and costs the same amount, over a comparable period of time it costs the consumer twice as much money. I don't see how this sort of exploitation could be viewed as defensible, but if you're fine with it that's cool.
n1keym1key t1_iwrrkrp wrote
Its the same with all tech though. Take TV's for instance. Back in the 90's I could go buy a Sony TV and know it was going to last for years and years barring any accidents and it wouldn't cost me £3k. TV's today just are not designed to last that long and they cost more too.
Many of those 90's/Early 00's CRT tv's are still going strong today and used by many in the retro gaming community. We won't be saying that about the flatscreens of today in 20+ years time.
barbanonfacitvirum t1_iwrrohb wrote
Correct. That is literally what I am saying is the problem.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments