Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

playboysharted t1_j0c6vex wrote

Reply to comment by Kear_Bear_3747 in xbox series s by [deleted]

:(((( thanks

2

Kear_Bear_3747 t1_j0cg7nw wrote

I would just spring for an SX honestly. It pisses me right off that SS doesn’t target 4K.

1

playboysharted t1_j0cgedm wrote

dont have 4k monitor so not my biggest issue but yeah if microsoft can they will fuck us over lmao

2

Kear_Bear_3747 t1_j0cgrwf wrote

I use my SS at my desk with my computer monitors that are 2K rated and it looks great, so you should be fine in that case.

1

NecessaryQueasy6894 t1_j0d5gai wrote

I mean it's £199, what do you expect?

1

Kear_Bear_3747 t1_j0ddzek wrote

I expect it to be 4K rated!

1

NecessaryQueasy6894 t1_j0deiar wrote

I'm guessing that you're being sarcastic, but a 4k 60fps pc would be atleast 1.5k, so considering that the series X (450) targets 4k is crazy. Even for £199, have fun getting a pc that can do 120fps 1080p

0

Kear_Bear_3747 t1_j0diepc wrote

Why would you need 120fps? That’s like twice the range humans can perceive frames. LOL

1

NecessaryQueasy6894 t1_j0dilpm wrote

While 60 is enough, 120 is alot better, and while not huge, it is a visible difference (also in input delay). Either way, make me a pc with new parts and 1 year warranty that does 1080p 120fps, for £200. Or one that does 4k 60fps for £450

1

Kear_Bear_3747 t1_j0diqbj wrote

Sounds like you’re starting to learn that PC components are overpriced compared to their manufacturing cost. LMAO

1

NecessaryQueasy6894 t1_j0dj22t wrote

That doesn't matter, you expect a £199 console to do 4k, when you'd need a 1.5k minimum pc to do that lmao. I couldn't care less about price to manufacture cost, I'm going off of what you said

1