Submitted by takeasecond t3_10t6t4r in dataisbeautiful
TheDiano t1_j7cxsah wrote
Reply to comment by aussie_punmaster in W-2 Wage Distribution by Tax Bracket & Gender [OC] by takeasecond
Do you by any chance understand the words causation and correlation? Because I’m not sure you do
aussie_punmaster t1_j7ex3u0 wrote
I do, do you understand English? Because I’m not sure you do.
What if I’m developing a policy for a discounted medical treatment which is gender specific and will apply to those on incomes below X? I don’t really care why there’s a difference, I just need to know that there’ll be one in the supplies that I’ll need.
I’d wager your great concern is because you’re fixated on the use/conclusion of the data you have in mind.
TheDiano t1_j7fv5xf wrote
Exactly, at that point you look at the data and distribute accordingly. The data is what it is, it doesn’t mean it’s discriminatory
aussie_punmaster t1_j7gw4cv wrote
You just told on yourself. I never said anything about it being discriminatory.
As I suspected, you’re so worried that someone might conclude it’s discrimination you’re jumping at shadows.
TheDiano t1_j7h8f7g wrote
Then I misinterpreted what you said, my apologies.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments