Submitted by coingecko t3_114cs54 in dataisbeautiful
Yacobeam t1_j8wfqly wrote
Reply to comment by Hendursag in [OC] Which Political Groups did Former FTX Executives Donate to? by coingecko
This has not been proven. It is strictly here-say
LemonDesu t1_j8wgpoi wrote
here-say đđ
cujobob t1_j8whuwo wrote
Hearsay^ and the man himself said it đ
wallstreet_vagabond2 t1_j8wicmq wrote
That's just like your opinion man
AdminsAreLazyID10TS t1_j8wlkcu wrote
That man?
Merriam-Webster.
Yacobeam t1_j8xkhts wrote
Regardless of my grammar he wasnât under oath when he made those comments and no evidence was provided to support the claim. Additionally, he did not respond to comment as noted in the linked article.
cujobob t1_j8xnxu0 wrote
It would make absolutely no sense for him to lie about such a thing.
ââAll my Republican donations were dark,â he said, referring to political donations that are not publicly disclosed in FEC filings. âThe reason was not for regulatory reasons, itâs because reporters freak the fâk out if you donate to Republicans. Theyâre all super liberal, and I didnât want to have that fight.ââ
Spoken like a true MAGA.
AdditionallyâŚ
âStuart McPhail, senior litigation counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group that filed an FEC complaint against Bankman-Fried last week, says his claims and the campaign finance charges could spur changes to election laws.
âThere are a number of loopholes and limits that Sam Bankman-Fried was able to exploit that Congress can fix,â he tells TIME. âHe directed money to influence elections but hid where that money came from.ââ
https://time.com/6241262/sam-bankman-fried-political-donations/
It just sort of seems like you donât want it to be true so you wonât believe itâs true. If you have evidence that he lied, state that evidence.
Yacobeam t1_j8ykcar wrote
Jfc the lengths you are going tells me you have been done this path before
Yacobeam t1_j8xlg0m wrote
People can heresay themselvesâŚ
cujobob t1_j8xok0h wrote
How does that apply here? How is this a court of law, anyways? This is a subreddit. Itâs not even a Wendyâs. You being wrong here doesnât matter in the grand scheme of things. The lengths youâre going to avoid being wrong tells me youâve been down this path plenty before.
Yacobeam t1_j8yka0l wrote
Youre a moron
Uncle-Cake t1_j8wk5tq wrote
Lick the boot
Just-Quit-8034 t1_j8wwmei wrote
Yes let's trust the Friedmans word, btw i am Nigerian prince I have a proposition
[deleted] t1_j8x798r wrote
[removed]
TargetMost8136 t1_j8wl062 wrote
Found the person with a boot licking fetish
Uncle-Cake t1_j8wmock wrote
Is this like when someone points out racism and you say "YOU'RE the racist!"
TargetMost8136 t1_j8wnloc wrote
No itâs cause a lot of Redditors like you are obsessed with âbootlickingâ for some reason like you canât think about anything else but bootlicking.. Maybe the thought of it intrigues you?
Uncle-Cake t1_j8x5hxy wrote
Yes, that's the exact same logic as when people say "Why do you keep talking about racism? Why are you obsessed with race? Maybe YOU'RE the racist?" It's Charlie Kirk logic.
[deleted] t1_j8xavti wrote
[removed]
UberWidget t1_j8xab6e wrote
Itâs not hearsay if it came straight from Bankman-Fried.
[deleted] t1_j8wwru7 wrote
[removed]
Iffykindofguy t1_j8x5d1z wrote
Sorry it hurts your feelings bud but that's neither hear nor their
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments