Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bitmoresalt OP t1_jeb6zmb wrote

Even the optimists are unsure, so they still give about 10% chance of bad effects (on average). Similarly for the pessimist.

The data actually works in the other way: the right is the raw data, and the left subdivision is based on that.

Original visualization (which is also pretty beautiful but perhaps a bit harder to interpret): https://twitter.com/KatjaGrace/status/1635280174748164096/photo/1

7

torchma t1_jebbfa1 wrote

In other words it's arbitrary groupings. The original visualization doesn't suffer from that.

5