Submitted by adashofdata t3_11g4aym in dataisbeautiful
emilbm t1_janimkg wrote
Why the numbers? They obscure the album covers and they add literally nothing to the visualization
molbion t1_jaof9nf wrote
Why are y’all booing him. He’s right. I didn’t even see the album covers till he mentioned them.
lolikamani t1_jaot92p wrote
Me too
aghajarnia t1_japkp31 wrote
This data visualization is about the colors mentioned in the lyrics. I think it makes sense that the album covers are grayed out so as not to distract from the “data”
Daydream_Meanderer t1_jaqpyew wrote
Okay but why the numbers
[deleted] t1_jaqvsll wrote
Right? Does it go in order of albums she produced or what?
Daydream_Meanderer t1_jaqx4vt wrote
I mean they’re in chronological order, that’s what the number are, but unnecessary because it obscures the album cover and it can be assumed they’re chronological.
[deleted] t1_jar7mto wrote
Yeah but “beautiful data” shouldn’t have to be assumed it should be presented
Daydream_Meanderer t1_jar85c4 wrote
Then my recommendation is put an annotation that albums are listed chronologically in the bottom margin, and keep the albums below each data set, translucent at like 20% opacity.
[deleted] t1_jara0v2 wrote
That would be a good fix to the problem
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments