Submitted by theotheredmund t3_11rpst9 in dataisbeautiful
Bennito_bh t1_jcdlvbe wrote
Reply to comment by Lakeside_Tigger in [OC] MCU vs. DCU in Rotten Tomatoes by theotheredmund
Sounds like a preposterously bad system
MVRKHNTR t1_jcdw7i5 wrote
What? How?
Bennito_bh t1_jce145u wrote
My man, if rounding to the nearest hundred in a metric where 100 is the maximum score doesn’t already sound terrible to you, I won’t be able to explain it.
MVRKHNTR t1_jce1l5j wrote
I have no idea what it is you're trying to say.
BelovedOmegaMan t1_jcegh10 wrote
None of us do either. I'm sure they'll make some excuse about it.
BelovedOmegaMan t1_jcegfrc wrote
You don't understand how percentages work and are embarrassing yourself publicly about it. I would suggest asking one of your teachers to explain this to you.
Bennito_bh t1_jcfnme7 wrote
For RT critics there is no difference between 9 critics scoring 100 and 1 scoring 49, and 9 critics scoring 51 with 1 scoring 49.
So fuck off. The system’s terrible.
MVRKHNTR t1_jcfp6z8 wrote
RT only tells you what percentage of critics gave a positive review, not how good something is. This is like having your height measured and complaining about how that number didn't tell you your weight.
Bennito_bh t1_jcfq5h7 wrote
Telling what % of critics gave positive review is worse under every metric than simply averaging the scores my man. Outliers count for more under their system.
It asks critics: “Tell me with a score of 0 or 1, how good was this movie?”
MVRKHNTR t1_jcfrqfn wrote
It's worse in your opinion because you're trying to figure out how good something is and that's not what it's for. It's there to tell you how likely you are to enjoy something and it's much better for that.
Bennito_bh t1_jcft16p wrote
It’s categorically worse. Instead of doing both, it’a poorly attempting and failing to do one.
For RT critics there is no difference between 9 critics scoring 100 and 1 scoring 49, and 9 critics scoring 51 with 1 scoring 49.
You are not equally likely to enjoy both of these films.
MVRKHNTR t1_jcfxdap wrote
Rotten Tomatoes isn't actually automated like that. Critics mark their reviews as positive or negative.
So in both of your examples, 9/10 people said "Yeah, I liked this" so you have a 9/10 chance of liking it.
Suspicious-Feeling-1 t1_jcdzohc wrote
It depends on what you're using ratings for. A binary of good movie / bad movie works great if you are trying to pick a movie with the highest probability of being something you would enjoy. If you want a movie to totally blow you away, an IMDB score or a tally of awards won might be more useful.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments