I think I am the only one having trouble reading this.

This also needs to be broken apart by “type.” You are lumping huge amounts of culture under these broad racial and ethnic categories. Fine detail isn’t possible but at least “Black immigrant” and “South Asian” and “White Hispanic” and “Black Hispanic” need to be elucidated. I have a sneaking suspicion that that very broad ETHNIC category of “Hispanic” has RACIAL disparities within it. To me, this data isn’t saying much since it’s not clear who exactly needs the most targeting for educational campaigns. Hispanic isn’t clear. You’re also lumping male and female together as well. This is an example of data is likely correct but not represented in a useful fashion.

ETA: also immigration status would also be something to consider since I see the source is raw census data that you’ve analyzed, i.e., you’ve analyzed 18-44 year olds but when did they arrive in the US, if US-based education is the litmus vs education received anywhere? This is considering Latin American immigrants make up a sizable portion of the immigrant population. It would be useful for all categories to separate between immigrant and US-born tbh.