Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KeaganItReal t1_iu2b4ay wrote

What is "this" exactly? And how it reflected in "which" students?

−46

Wounded_Hand t1_iu3ap91 wrote

“This” : URM students being accepted to these colleges to fulfill a quota, rather than based on merit.

“Which” : URM is defined in the graphic.

37

KeaganItReal t1_iu3czgs wrote

No part of this graphic should lead you or the commenter or anyone else to "this" conclusion. The population of people who take the SAT and the population who enter one of those 5 schools are very different in volume. The chart visualizes students who scored over 1400 on their SAT. That includes plenty of students who just got 1400 and plenty who got perfect scores and lots in between. Without any other info you don't know if the urm group on the right were the most meritorious and worthy of entry or even what their SAT scores are at all other than that it was over 1400.

So that would be a petty stupid assumption, one that I'm pretty sure most intelligent people wouldn't make. I still wouldn't see the link between that asinine conclusion and degree inflation. Even if there's an issue of letting non-meritorious candidates in, there should be no issue of degree or grade inflation just because the wrong kids got in. They'll flame out or underperform (which is actually a much bigger problem that degree inflation). Grade and degree inflation is an issue with the education and educators at those particular institutions. Maybe original commenter is just a shitty educator at a shitty school.

−18

pjasbi t1_iu2cewb wrote

Read the graph, figure it out

27

Specific_Raisin8169 t1_iu2ofh0 wrote

They can’t read graphs or figure things out— they’re part of that ‘special’ group who just got in because…. You know. 🤷🏻‍♂️

10

KeaganItReal t1_iu2va4m wrote

Dude what admissions officer hurt you? You tell me the point this assclown is trying to make? How are you choosing to interpret this data to fit your narcissistic worldview and victim mentality?

−43

KeaganItReal t1_iu2v31c wrote

Or perhaps you don't really have a point and your an elitist intellectual snob looking for a space to be a victim.

−19

pjasbi t1_iu2x8yj wrote

No one is victimizing, though you do seem to be projecting. It’s just data, presented simply. Barring apparent manipulation, my point is self evident. I’m sure you’ll figure it out soon, keep trying

15

okhan3 t1_iu361m5 wrote

It is funny you’re afraid to say it explicitly though

−9

TaiyaCo t1_iu3emif wrote

Yet none of y'all can clearly state your point

−12