Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

USAFacts_Official OP t1_it32ui8 wrote

Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act covers localities that meet two criteria:

  • More than 10,000 or over 5% of voting-age citizens in state, county or municipality must be “members of a single language minority group,” and have limited English proficiency. For example, Hispanics with limited English proficiency are 5.8% of California’s population. That means all elections in the state must include ballots and election information in Spanish, even if an individual county or city doesn’t meet that population threshold.
  • The language minority must have depressed literacy rates. Depressed literacy rates are based on whether the share of the language minority’s voting age citizens with a fifth-grade education is less than the national share.

These determinations are made with Census data for Hispanic/Latino, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Asian race and ethnicity groups.

But this process excludes some communities with limited English skills. For example, immigrants from North Africa who primarily speak Arabic (and are marked white on the Census) or immigrants from Haiti who primarily speak Creole (marked African American on the Census) would not be covered under Section 203. The Census Bureau is actively researching the inclusion of “Middle Eastern or North African” as a separate racial response category, but the official Standards of Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity have not been revised since 1997.

Spanish is the most covered language under section 203. Three states and 194 other counties in the US require ballots to be provided in Spanish. The next most common languages provided throughout the US are Chinese, Vietnamese, Navajo, Choctaw, and Filipino. Twenty states and Washington, DC do not have any localities that are required to provide non-English voting materials.

46

nsnyder t1_it3l6e2 wrote

Why doesn't Sioux make the cut in South Dakota? Seems to meet those criteria.

11

ElJanitorFrank t1_it41y6s wrote

There are enough Sioux people in south Dakota that don't speak English? These ballots are to aid people with very limited English ability.

35

HoAdanac t1_itdfmef wrote

It'd be a waste of money if they can read english

1

qqtan36 t1_it4s1rw wrote

"Filipino" don't you mean tagalog?

5

Norwester77 t1_it69ri9 wrote

Basically, yes. Filipino is a standardized language based primarily on the Manila dialect of Tagalog.

9

randomthad69 t1_it641ib wrote

Tagalog is just one of of hundreds of the many languages spoken in the Philippines.

4

Norwester77 t1_it6ap3y wrote

We’ve got communities with large numbers of Russian and Ukrainian speakers, but those aren’t covered under Section 203, nor are African languages like Amharic and Somali.

1