Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

-Robbert- t1_itbeope wrote

Do this again and add the Netherlands

−15

charlie6583 t1_itbgr8z wrote

Chins must keep the quality manufactured goods. No need for repairman

1

Disastrous-Year571 t1_itbh9ot wrote

There is no explanation of that category at the Genuine Impact website, and the World Bank doesn’t classify GDP into 4 sectors in any of the documents I could find.

I wonder if “Other” in this chart it is things like mining, transportation, fishing, or real estate, which often are included in the 3 primary sectors in other datasets. Hard to know.

88

BBOoff t1_itbjfvt wrote

If anyone is wondering why Agriculture seems to be unusually low, be aware that this graph is only counting the actual economic activity of the farms/greenhouses themselves as Agriculture.

You may see higher percentages in other sources, because some other sources prefer to show the entire agri-food industry together, including the various sectors that are here classified as manufacturing and services.

199

29minutebreak t1_itbk2o9 wrote

The “service industry“ is a patronizing way of calling people slaves.

−32

APJYB t1_itbkxzw wrote

Chinese real estate investment and speculation (not the manufacturing of said real estate) constitutes around 15-30% of their GDP. I’m curious where this would be captured.

11

Disastrous-Year571 t1_itbowj4 wrote

Service sector is actually pretty broad - airline pilots, doctors, university professors, bankers and investment analysts, plumbing and electrical business owners, media celebrities, IT managers etc would all be service sector in most definitions

Not every service sector job is in a Comcast call center or fast food restaurant, thankfully

27

FITnLIT7 t1_itbs2ck wrote

Only thing we’re constructing up here in Canada is overpriced homes.

25

ButtholeMcButtybutt t1_itbt4g7 wrote

I live in southern Ontario , near brampton (aka canadian india) I'm led to believe their farmers are getting screwed due to the abundance of "no farmers no food" stickers on every vehicle. Looks like they got plenty of farmers to me... shut up and stop making the insurance rates so high.

3

AdAcrobatic7236 t1_itbvuw9 wrote

Blunt analysis. Please provide a more detailed response. 🔥

1

Fit-Plant-306 t1_itbyzis wrote

Op would be my idol if they created a 30 year moving chart…

0

Leetcoder20 t1_itc64o1 wrote

It's all punjabi propaganda, they actually want a seperate sikh nation called khalistan while Majority of the Indians including Indian punjabis are against it, that's why they remain so pissed about India in general.

21

NorthEnglandChap t1_itcazd4 wrote

France and UK very similar. I always France was the farmer of Europe.

2

waszumfickleseich t1_itci9oz wrote

the official numbers for Germany are

agriculture 0.9%

construction 5.5%

industry excluding construction 24%

service 69.5%

https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/36846/umfrage/anteil-der-wirtschaftsbereiche-am-bruttoinlandsprodukt/

those numbers add up to around 100%

OP's chart says Industry includes construction, but from my numbers above that definitely can't be the case. Can only explain that while it says it's included in "Industry", it actually is not and therefore it was added to the "other" category, just like you said

39

VALMaX1 t1_itcjt93 wrote

Industry should have a much higher share in chinese economy.

And by the way Japan do produce a heck lot of mechanical goods which they export so their industrial sector must have a much higher share in their GDP.

−11

Complex_Inspector_60 t1_itct623 wrote

Services dominate - so it's slavery - the corporations are making money off the backs of the people who actually do the work.

−13

Equivalent_Poetry339 t1_itcwgxy wrote

Just gotta say I absolutely looooove the cigarette chart style. It’s perfect for my job with John Deere monitoring and benchmarking idle hours. Glad someone else is using it

1

Sometimes_Stutters t1_itd9lp6 wrote

Maybe I’m old school or biased (manufacturing engineer) but I have a hard time believing that economies that aren’t primarily agricultural and industry are healthy. Value creation is firm. Value provided is less so.

5

dabe7125 t1_itdfmma wrote

Again, it seems the majority of the “data” on this sub is all misleading…

13

alarsonious t1_itdh4mf wrote

Try changing that "service" sector into service and Finance.

1

broccolindian t1_itdi6kr wrote

I've always wondered when people called India a heavy service oriented economy. Now I see these bars I wonder if they knew what they were talking about.

1

Fun_Designer7898 t1_itdidud wrote

Time moves on

The world is getting ever closer to consisting of 75% services

Services employ by far the most people and produce by far the most value.

Services employ now more than industry and agriculture together, industry was once the largest employer followed by agriculture and then services

7

mnbvcxz9753 t1_itdklw2 wrote

is there are correlation between a country’s “industry %” and it’s overall economic health?

1

sailingthestyx t1_itdn3y0 wrote

India’s balance would seem to foster the greatest long term sustainability.

4

chin-ki-chaddi t1_itdnsd2 wrote

I heard a conspiracy theory, which sounded kinda logical to me. The Canadian sikhs want to portray Indian government as anti-Sikh so they can be considered as a persecuted group in the eyes of Canadian government. This would help them in bringing over their family members on work visas and all.

1

DrSOGU t1_itdosjg wrote

"Others" = prostitution and illegal drugs

3

cptnobveus t1_itdpzqv wrote

US should definitely have more industry. We are mostly takers.

1

bernardosousa t1_itdrcou wrote

What was the criteria for country selection?

1

classicalL t1_itds8mp wrote

The life cycle of all things: small group with high quality, gets more popular, quality reaches that of general population (not high).

This sub, reddit, the internet at large. It all follows this pattern.

5

eva01beast t1_itdyhcl wrote

Service sector has a such a broad definition, that you would count the security guard and the supervisors at factories as "service sector" employees and not "manufacturing sector" employees. Any job where you're not directly growing something or making a good is considered a service sector job.

4

bernardosousa t1_itdylx9 wrote

I thought Brazil was ahead of South Korea for several years. I clicked through the source links, but couldn't find the ordered list. Sites like ourworldindata.com and worldpopulationreview.com both have different lists. That's why a asked. This list seamed to be drawn with different criteria to me. What am I missing?

1

Sparkykun t1_ite6pvy wrote

What about internet subscriptions services?

1

Toxicsully t1_itecpc5 wrote

Isn’t the US an absolute agricultural unit?

4

GeneralNathanJessup t1_iteivxv wrote

The US is the world's largest food exporter, exporting twice as much food as any other country. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-american-food-giant-the-largest-exporter-of-food-in-the-world.html

Also, the US is the world's largest weapons exporter, exporting twice as much as any other country. https://www.statista.com/statistics/267131/market-share-of-the-leadings-exporters-of-conventional-weapons/

Food and weapons are the cornerstones of any enduring civilization.

1

eva01beast t1_itek0en wrote

I'm just explaining why the service sector contributes so much to the GDP. The value of a service doesn't need to be high, but the fact that so many people out there are creating services over goods could be why the contribution of the service sector is so high.

2

Brzwolf t1_ites46o wrote

Yes, but its even more of a unit in the other sectors lol. That and technically U.S agriculture is extremely subsidized by the government to keep it as big as it is, though Im not sure if that affects the graph here.

3

Brzwolf t1_itetln9 wrote

>The black market estimates are added by every country when counting GDP, besides that the Italian black market estimates according to some are low in comparison with the reality.

Its all relative, the U.S likely has far more 'other' then the UK or france do on their own but the U.S is also a massive powerhouse in industry and services so 'other' could easily make up a smaller % of its bar.

1

TotallynottheCCP t1_itf5iu8 wrote

Am I the only one that finds it concerning that so much of the US economy is based around services? Covid taught us what can happen to the service industry...

2

itchy_008 t1_itfhrgg wrote

anything that does not involve selling, buying or processing. or selling anything bought or processed. or buying anything sold or processed. or processing anything bought or sold. or repairing anything sold, bought or processed.

2

BBOoff t1_itfyiu7 wrote

No idea.

I used the Agriculture Canada numbers to find out why Canada's Agriculture percentage was lower than I'm used to seeing, but Agriculture Canada only records domestic production and export, not imports.

I have no idea where to find import numbers.

1

CampEmbarrassed170 t1_itl4vhx wrote

So in other words I’m screwed as an American because we don’t make or plant as much to be self-sufficient?

1

LonerDottyRebel t1_itl67w1 wrote

No. We produce untold surpluses of food. It winds up being a large fraction of what's considered manufacturing in this data. And Monsanto Superfarms don't need a lot of labor per acre farmed like family farms, so that's why that slice has shrunk so much.

But we have a massive durable goods trade deficit. It's bleeding value out of our currency. We can't just make consumption goods and provide services. We need to start making tangible products and they have to be competitive in export markets.

We also need higher interest rates and to slash government spending, but those are whole rants in and of themselves.

1

Ulyks t1_iu49kcg wrote

On paper there is no private land but in reality there are a huge amount of land deals.

The government is buying out the farmers and selling the land to developers all the time.

Taxes aren't counted in GDP, that would be GDI.

GDP = consumption + investment + government spending +/- (exports - imports)

1