Submitted by row64software t3_ym3ddi in dataisbeautiful
_BreakingGood_ t1_iv61i3p wrote
Reply to comment by 40for60 in [OC] Forbes 2022's Most Philanthropic US Billionaires by row64software
Yes I said "beneficial from a tax situation" not "tax free"
Learn English mate
40for60 t1_iv61sla wrote
But it isn't and would be a big expensive hassle that could put the family members in legal jeopardy for no good reason if the only goal was to funnel money to heirs. Also I'm not your mate, I want nothing to do with you.
_BreakingGood_ t1_iv6k1zv wrote
Nope it's pretty well practiced as an approach, nothing illegal about it. Your child or friend just happens to be an executive at the nonprofit you founded. How is that illegal?
Tax benefits come from being able to donate to the non-profit to pay their salary, rather than giving them a flat gift, which has huge taxes after around 11 million.
40for60 t1_iv6lu0f wrote
Nothing illegal about doing legal things but there are rules and self dealing is a issue.
If the goal is to get your kids money without the expectation of them doing anything for it there are better ways. Why go through the hassle of setting up a fraudulent foundation? What kind of attorney's and accountants will participate in an obvious illegal venture? All you are doing is generalizing so we might as well say all poor people are criminals too because some poor people steal things. If a person intends to create a foundation and donate money to it with a stipulation that the children are on the board or payroll and they do nothing for it at some point it will be a issue if its abused. My guess is that this problem is much smaller then what you want to believe and most foundations act in good faith. I personal have been involved in many and have yet to witness this kind of bullshit. Do foundations sometimes get top heavy, yes, do they make mistakes, yes, but self dealing as a practice, I doubt its that big of a issue.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments