Submitted by icywatermelons t3_ymwt9j in dataisbeautiful
Comments
purple_yosher t1_iv5zdm9 wrote
fell into the black hole New Zealand usually disappears into
iamapizza t1_iv60pcb wrote
Interesting that you don't usually see those two on a map at the same time. 🤔
LanewayRat t1_iv7edgh wrote
But it’s weird when a black hole takes half an island neatly down the border
purple_yosher t1_iv7ifnq wrote
global politics works in mysterious ways
dml997 t1_iv7jma6 wrote
Your link is to a data website but does not show at all what metrics you purport to be showing. I don't know why you expect the reader to wade through this and spend who knows how much time to replicate what you present.
Inevitable_Ad_5695 t1_iv7kaje wrote
Yeah, this map is D+ at best. Also, should have broken out more developed vs. developing countries since the wealthier a country gets, more meat tends to be consumed.
TheMastro1 t1_iv7u11j wrote
Look at the source material.
icywatermelons OP t1_iv87y1l wrote
Hi, I'm sorry about that but the FAO website doesn't provide individual links when you filter the results. My bad, I stated the food supply metric only but didn't include the items, which were meat and vegetables (aggregated). Thanks for the reminder, I'll make an edit to the note.
hagnat t1_iv899cg wrote
whenever someone groups Brazil, and Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, and Chile, with the rest of South America... i know that person knows shit about geopolitics in South America
himishim t1_iv8ksgq wrote
The meat element in this graph does not consider human meat.
FinancialAd6213 t1_iv9i2jd wrote
South America is kinda bullshit, even though OP pointed it out
That's not the meat we eat, that's the meat the rest of the world eats
We can't afford our meat
[deleted] t1_iv9mnl6 wrote
[deleted]
bapo225 t1_iv9msgo wrote
If you look closely it seems Western Russia and Eastern Russia are two separate regions, they're just not labeled.
-Tasty-Energy- t1_iv9ookw wrote
So 60% is perfect? Half and half.
BananadiN t1_iv9tx67 wrote
Most of Brazils economy rely on catle and soy
Manucarba t1_iva352d wrote
Same with Argentina
ffffff52 t1_ivac2rx wrote
If you look closely the Balkans too... and Kaliningrade.
The closer and longer you look at the map the worse it gets, missplaced divisions are the least wrong thing once you notice all the missing islands
redline489 t1_ivcov0b wrote
Most peculiar choice of colors.
icywatermelons OP t1_ivivnyb wrote
100% is a 1:1 ratio!
icywatermelons OP t1_ivy3qw1 wrote
not production but supply per capita! it's sometimes used as an estimate for consumption too!
TheRedditHike t1_ivzlikd wrote
Have you ever been to Argentina???
FinancialAd6213 t1_iw6g0tf wrote
Sure, but that's south America not just Argentina
TheRedditHike t1_iwdsjoy wrote
That's just one example, Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia a fair amount of meat is eaten. Rice and Beans too. People eat meat, of every social class. Even if the upper class probably eats more. It's accurate to say that more meat is eaten than East Asia, Africa, South Asia and maybe Europe too (especially in the Southern Cone).
FinancialAd6213 t1_ix7nxpm wrote
There's solid meat consumption sure but meat production is mostly for export, hence the huge numbers
icywatermelons OP t1_iv5u0y3 wrote
Note:
Calculated based on meat-to-vegetable supply: (meat/vegetable)*100
Food supply is not the same as consumption but is often used as an estimate of consumption
Link:
https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS (the website doesn't support individual links based on filters)
Element: food supply (kg/capita/yr)
Items: meat, vegetables (aggregated)
Tools: Tableau