Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

JoshuaACNewman t1_ixw4rwx wrote

I don’t think you understand what “data”, “beautiful”, or “proof” means. But the entire argument hinges on the idea of establishing a trend looking at only the first couple years of the sample.

Since this is quite a mishmash and quite loudly a priori in favor of particular policies, I don’t think this meets minimum requirements for this sub.

5

brainwired1 t1_ixw4xk3 wrote

Yeah, all those mass shootings that they've had since then...

2

st4n13l t1_ixw52ov wrote

What is really evident here is that half-assing these policies does very little to impact gun deaths if all you really end up doing is paying people for their old guns so they can buy new ones a couple of years later... especially if crime is already on a downward trajectory.

1

hiim379 OP t1_ixw5ngy wrote

Ya regular gun buy backs like how they do it in the US are a joke and basiclly do what you said plus dispose of evidence. The one in Australia wasn't half assed and pretty much made anyone who is following the law have so many types of guns no longer available to them.

0

hiim379 OP t1_ixw9ev3 wrote

Thank you, thats a great study. I just wish they add non fire arm massacres to that, while massacres have massively decrease since the gun buyback their not non existent. A good example would be the Childers Palace Backpackers Hostel fire.

1