Submitted by pigecoin69420 t3_zfz3zx in dataisbeautiful
yes_its_him t1_izezxrt wrote
Reply to comment by Rat_Salat in [OC] Guns in the US and Canada by pigecoin69420
I am not doing anything except reporting what governments say in their official numbers.
You seem to be the one making random evidence-free assertions
Rat_Salat t1_izf3eld wrote
I'm not gonna write a research paper to debunk this American gun propaganda. All you have to do is drive from Toronto to Buffalo, Windsor to Detroit or from Vancouver to Seattle to know that these numbers aren't accurate.
Triple the violent crime rate, despite having a third as many murders. Sure, seems totally accurate. Graph isn't accurate on that one either. Canada's murder rate isn't as low as OP suggests.
pigecoin69420 OP t1_j2dyhe0 wrote
Numbers are important to understanding the world, though of course there could be bias in any data set. It would be really worthwhile if you could identify a potential cause for bias in the data set. When data seems strange, it could be a sampling artifact (bias), or it could be real and up to us to uncover the reason for the strangeness...
I'll put my tin-foil speculations hat on for a second to offer a pro gun explanation for the data: what if higher rates of gun ownership led overall to fewer crimes overall because some sort of deterrence from gun owning population?
The point is, it could be bias, however the differences are quite large, suggesting that it's more likely to be incomplete understanding of the factors at play, warranting research studies to investigate why such differences in crime might exist between two quite similar countries.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments