Comments
finally_heree t1_j05nlbn wrote
Interesting, expect ree pie chart
GrimeOfTheAncients t1_j05nyz6 wrote
It's a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy thoug.... expenditure on military bizarrely enough contributes to GDP.
So the USA pumps trillions into it's military industrial complex which shows up as a marvelous gdp whilst many of it's citizens are homeless and without medical care.
Laranjaverso t1_j05otaz wrote
English isn't my first language so you can help me, what's GDP?
8th_Floor t1_j05qibj wrote
Gross Domestic Product. It's a measure of the value of all goods and services produced by countries
Sweet-Focus-6331 t1_j05xf2z wrote
greed will result to no good... tsk
MidnightPale3220 t1_j05xzhi wrote
Also not all defence alliances are equal.
For example, currently there is a military conflict between Armenia (member of CSTO) and Azerbaijan, as well as between Kyrgyzstan (member of CSTO) and Tajikistan (observer status in CSTO). Russia as main "security provider" within CSTO doesn't appear to provide any meaningful security for its members in these cases.
MyaheeMyastone t1_j0608d5 wrote
It must be nice to be a small European country with free healthcare and generous welfare policies without having to contribute anything towards defense spending.
Literal continents rely on the US defense mechanism
SHODANs_insect t1_j064mdk wrote
That doesn't necessarily mean much, though. There are states in the US that are bigger recipients of federal funds than contributors of federal funds. There are many ways to carve up populations to indicate that some people are getting a free ride.
The disappointing thing about the US is that it has the capacity to retain its current military spending and provide universal healthcare and more generous welfare policies - and it doesn't.
never_rains t1_j065fnr wrote
When it is the whole continent of Europe getting a free ride on US defense spending it becomes a problem. The problem was known but not acknowledged. Now even the Finnish PM accepts that European security is too dependent on US. Germans aren’t spending enough to defend themselves. UK has a decent navy but there army is too small to offer any challenge. French might be the only one doing enough in terms of land army.
never_rains t1_j065lyx wrote
Not all alliances are mutually exclusive. Pakistan is a major non NATO ally but India has closer relationship with US via quad in terms of Chinese threat. If there is a conflict between India and China then US would supply weapons to India and Pakistan would provide support to China.
SHODANs_insect t1_j065qcg wrote
>When it is the whole continent of Europe getting a free ride on US defense spending it becomes a problem.
What's the problem, exactly?
Because a moment ago it was that European nations could afford universal healthcare and generous welfare. The US can currently afford the same but chooses not to.
Are you moving the goalposts to another problem?
MidnightPale3220 t1_j067nyf wrote
True, but this doesn't invalidate my point that it is not necessarily very meaningful to just compare security alliances.
Can we talk about CSTO even being a security bloc if its members are fighting each other unchecked?
never_rains t1_j0681py wrote
I was not contradicting your point but agreeing to it. Not all alliances are equal and not all alliances are exclusive.
FromTheOrdovician t1_j077gvl wrote
Love how India always leads the non aligned
leela_martell t1_j07gyd9 wrote
Many "small European countries" have conscription. Every fifth person in my country (that has generous welfare policies) is in the army reserves and has completed at least 6 months of military service. It's just a different way to contribute.
The US has the money but most of its citizens don't have to go to the army.
AuburnElvis t1_j07o2xt wrote
OP doesn't acknowledge half of Africa's existence.
vtTownie t1_j07tkvx wrote
As well, at this point, us is a good defense ally with the Brit’s and other Western European countries, but generally defense and intelligence wise, the US is closest with the aussies.
MST3KTFCCTRT OP t1_j07w4sj wrote
They were a member of the Rio Treaty until 2002 when they withdrew over the looming Iraq War.
theincrediblenick t1_j08284b wrote
Venezuela? Really? As an ally of the US?
SenecatheEldest t1_j082g1g wrote
This chart is incredibly flawed. As someone mentioned, security arrangements vary in scope or scale - the Rio Treaty is defunct, and countries can be allies irrespective of formal security arrangements. For example, it strains belief to imagine that the US would treat an invasion of Austria or Ireland the same way it would treat one in the DRC or Sudan. Pakistan may b a 'Major Non-NATO Ally', but it's closer to China these days than the US.
partoftheplan4 t1_j08eq54 wrote
I think USA needs to be kinder to Mexico because we may need their help someday.
Glad-Degree-4270 t1_j08hidp wrote
They likely just copied a list of OAS member states or something.
GrimeOfTheAncients t1_j08m61s wrote
Good old propaganda cool aid that line....
I bet you're talking about Europe vs the Big Bad Russian Bear right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
UK alone is spending more than the Big Bad Bear. France and Germany combined dwarfs the Big Bad Bear's expenditure.
Look at graph 5 of https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/3/pdf/220331-def-exp-2021-en.PDF
It's clear that NATO allies expenditure is disproportionately large compared to the threat it's facing.
MasterAndrey2 t1_j08mu28 wrote
There's also extra
GDP = private consumption + gross private investment + government investment + government spending + (exports – imports)
MyaheeMyastone t1_j09hfan wrote
Yeah and that’s nice to have standing armies but large standing armies are not the name of the game anymore. It’s all about military tech, rockets, vehicles, etc. None of the countries conscripting are contributing even close to the amount the US does.
The sole reason these people are conscripted is so that they can learn how to use the equipment that we have developed for them
SnooPoems3567 t1_j0ahhpk wrote
Oh Pie Chart, you hide more information than you give. Half of Africa missing.
leela_martell t1_j0b5vqn wrote
My country paid 10 billion to the US for F-35s alone recently, you do understand that you’re getting money for that military tech? Yes the US military industry is big, but that is how the market works. I also use an Apple smartphone. 🤷🏻♀️
That doesn’t mean Europe isn’t too reliant on the US, cause we are, but us small countries are often punching well above our weight compared to the bigger European countries.
Anyways, the US is still the only Nato country to have ever invoked Article 5. So I guess your allies aren’t completely useless to you
Humble_Pension5153 t1_j0dzrom wrote
They are referring to the Rio Pact between several countries in the Americas. It states that attack against one is to be considered an attack against them all, although it is unlikely Venezuela will honour it.
MST3KTFCCTRT OP t1_j05n13b wrote
Data sources:
Tools used: