Submitted by giteam t3_zyxclj in dataisbeautiful
JesterSooner t1_j2cmn0o wrote
Reply to comment by DragoonXNucleon in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
Well, you aren’t paying taxes on it because you haven’t profited off the increase in value yet. The profit occurs when you sell, hence the taxes.
Like if you own a baseball with Babe Ruth’s signature it will go up in value with time, but you won’t actually get any cash from that unless you sell the baseball. Let’s say you were taxed on that increase in value before selling… ok, so you pay the tax even though you haven’t actually gained any money yet. After you pay the tax, you have the ball re-appraised and find out to your surprise that the signature is fake. Suddenly, your ball is worthless and you just paid taxes for money that you never actually had. Stocks work on a similar principle because “value” isn’t the same as “profit”
DragoonXNucleon t1_j2dqdpi wrote
Sure, its logical to not pay taxes, except its part of an increasingly common tax avoidance scheme.
Earn all money via stocks. Take out loans against those stocks. Never pay the loan back. Repeat the process and those that are uber rich never pay any taxes but have near infinite spending money.
So the rest of us give up 30% of our income and yet those who benefit from these buybacks pay 0.
JesterSooner t1_j2ef52s wrote
What bank anywhere in the world is giving out loans that don’t get paid back?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments